{"id":4633,"date":"2019-12-27T10:17:43","date_gmt":"2019-12-27T07:17:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/?p=4633"},"modified":"2021-01-08T22:20:09","modified_gmt":"2021-01-08T19:20:09","slug":"g-kararlar-i","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/g-kararlar-i\/","title":{"rendered":"G Kararlar I"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row][vc_column]\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t

G Kararlar\u0131 I<\/h4>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\n\t\t[vc_tta_accordion shape=”square” color=”sky” spacing=”25″ gap=”25″ c_position=”right” active_section=”1″ no_fill=”true” collapsible_all=”true”][vc_tta_section title=”G 1\/83, G 5\/83, G 6\/83: \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 TIBB\u0130 KULLANIM, \u0130SV\u0130\u00c7RE-T\u0130P\u0130 \u0130STEM” tab_id=”1609053421015-85d4f024-8f1b”][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n
\n

Kullan\u0131ma dair istemler i\u00e7eren bir Avrupa patenti, bir maddenin veya kompozisyonun insan veya hayvan v\u00fccudunu tedavi etmekte kullan\u0131m\u0131 i\u00e7in tescillenememektedir.<\/p><\/div>\n

Yeni ve bulu\u015f basama\u011f\u0131na sahip bir terap\u00f6tik uygulamada kullan\u0131lacak bir ilac\u0131n \u00fcretilmesinde bir madde veya kompozisyonun kullan\u0131m\u0131na dair istemler i\u00e7eren bir Avrupa patenti tescillenebilmekteyken bu karar EPC 2000 ile ge\u00e7ersiz k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. G 2\/08 sonras\u0131nda \u0130svi\u00e7re-tipi istemlere izin verilmemektedir.<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 1\/84″ tab_id=”1609056553876-6b95e6e8-e72e”][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
Bir Avrupa patentine itiraz bildirimi patent sahibi taraf\u0131ndan dosyalanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ge\u00e7ersiz say\u0131lamamakta iken bu karar G 9\/93 karar\u0131 ile ge\u00e7ersiz k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 1\/86: HAKLARI YEN\u0130DEN TES\u0130S ETME, TEMY\u0130Z” tab_id=”1609056580046-230a8f3e-e155″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
EPC Madde 122, sadece ba\u015fvuru sahibi ve patent sahibi i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli olarak yorumlanmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Daval\u0131 olan temyiz eden taraf\u0131n itiraz gerek\u00e7elerini dosyalamak i\u00e7in s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131na uymad\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda EPC Madde 122 nezdinde haklar\u0131n\u0131 yeniden tesis ettirebilmesi olas\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130tiraz bildirimi dosyalamak i\u00e7in 2 ay d\u00f6neminin yeniden tesis edilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 1\/88: K\u00d6T\u00dc Y\u00d6NDE ETK\u0130LENEN TARAF, TEMY\u0130Z” tab_id=”1609056594092-5340f093-3d82″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
Temyiz eden taraf\u0131n Avrupa patentini muhafaza edebilmek i\u00e7in EPC Kural 82 nezdinde gereken s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 i\u00e7inde metin \u00fczerinde d\u00fczeltme yapmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, temyizini ge\u00e7ersiz k\u0131lmamaktad\u0131r.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 2\/88 (G 6\/88): \u0130STEM KATEGOR\u0130S\u0130N\u0130N DE\u011e\u0130\u015eT\u0130R\u0130LMES\u0130, \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 TIBB\u0130 OLMAYAN KULLANIM, \u00dcR\u00dcN \u2192 KULLANIM KATEGOR\u0130 DE\u011e\u0130\u015e\u0130KL\u0130\u011e\u0130” tab_id=”1609056608627-f8c0bb37-48d7″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Tescil olmu\u015f istemlerin kategorilerinin itiraz i\u015flemlerinde de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi, e\u011fer istemler EPC Madde 69 ve protokol\u00fc uyar\u0131nca yorumland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda istemlerin tamam\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan sa\u011flanan koruma kapsam\u0131n\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesine yol a\u00e7m\u0131yorsa EPC Madde 123(3) nezdinde itiraz edilememektedir. Bu ba\u011flamda \u00fcye \u00fclkelerin ihlale dair yerel kanunlar\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmamal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

\u201cBir bile\u015fik\u201d veya \u201cbu t\u00fcr bir bile\u015fik i\u00e7eren bir kompozisyon\u201d ile ilgili tescillenmi\u015f istemlere yap\u0131lan bir de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fe, de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015f istemlerin belli bir ama\u00e7 i\u00e7in \u201co bile\u015fi\u011fin bir kompozisyonda kullan\u0131lmas\u0131\u201d ile ilgili istemler oldu\u011fu durumda EPC madde 123(3) nezdinde itiraz edilememektedir.<\/p><\/div>\n

Bilinen bir bile\u015fi\u011fin, patentte tan\u0131mlanan bir teknik etkiye dayan\u0131larak belli bir ama\u00e7 i\u00e7in kullan\u0131m\u0131na dair bir istem, o teknik etkiyi i\u015flevsel unsur olarak i\u00e7eriyor olarak yorumlanmal\u0131d\u0131r ve e\u011fer o teknik etki daha \u00f6nce kamuya a\u00e7\u0131klanmad\u0131ysa bu isteme EPC Madde 54(1) nezdinde itiraz edilememektedir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 4\/88: \u0130T\u0130RAZIN TRANSFER\u0130” tab_id=”1609056639346-46ca0b62-204d”][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Avrupa Patent Ofisi\u2019ne sunulan bir itiraz bildirimi \u015firket mal val\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile itiraz\u0131n dosyalanma \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n\u0131n bir par\u00e7as\u0131 olarak \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filere transfer edilebilir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 5\/88, G 7\/88, G 8\/88: BA\u015eKANIN YETK\u0130LER\u0130, \u0130Y\u0130 N\u0130YET” tab_id=”1609056663528-1063c85b-331f”][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Avrupa Patent Ofisi ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n EPC Madde 5(3) uyar\u0131nca Avrupa Patent Ofisi\u2019ni temsil etme kapasitesi, ba\u015fkan\u0131n bir i\u015flevidir ancak bir yetkisi de\u011fildir. Ba\u015fkan\u0131n yetkilerinin kapsam\u0131 EPC taraf\u0131ndan y\u00f6netilmektedir ama EPC madde 5(3) taraf\u0131ndan y\u00f6netilmemektedir.<\/p>\n

EPO ba\u015fkan\u0131 ve Alman Patent Ofisi ba\u015fkan\u0131 aras\u0131nda imzalanan, EPO\u2019ya g\u00f6nderilmek istenen ama Berlin\u2019deki Alman Patent Ofisi taraf\u0131ndan teslim al\u0131nan belgelerin i\u015flenmesini denetleyen maddeler i\u00e7eren 29 Haziran 1982 tarihli \u0130dari Anla\u015fma kapsam\u0131nda EPO ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n 1 Temmuz 1989\u2018da EPO dosyalama ofisinin a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131ndan \u00f6nce EPO ad\u0131na b\u00f6yle bir anla\u015fma imzalamaya yetkisi yoktu.<\/p>\n

E\u011fer bir ki\u015fi, s\u00f6z konusu anla\u015fman\u0131n Resmi Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131ndan sonra ve 1 Temmuz 1989 \u2018dan \u00f6nceki bir tarihte EPO\u2019ya g\u00f6ndermek istenen belgeleri Berlin\u2019deki Alman Patent Ofisi\u2019ne dosyalad\u0131ysa (elden dosyalamak hari\u00e7), iyi niyet prensibinin uygulanmas\u0131 ve EPO kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n me\u015fru beklentilerini korumak i\u00e7in EPO\u2019nun bu belgeleri Berlin\u2019deki Alman Patent Ofisi\u2019nin teslim alma tarihinde teslim alm\u0131\u015f gibi hareket etmesi gerekmekteydi.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 6\/88 (G 2\/88): \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 TIBB\u0130 OLMAYAN KULLANIM” tab_id=”1609056689615-e2f8320f-9ac0″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Bilinen bir bile\u015fi\u011fin, patentte tan\u0131mlanan bir teknik etkiye dayan\u0131larak belli bir ama\u00e7 i\u00e7in kullan\u0131m\u0131na dair bir istem, o teknik etkiyi i\u015flevsel unsur olarak i\u00e7eriyor olarak yorumlanmal\u0131d\u0131r ve e\u011fer o teknik etki daha \u00f6nce kamuya a\u00e7\u0131klanmad\u0131ysa bu isteme EPC Madde 54(1) nezdinde itiraz edilememektedir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 1\/89: PCT, ULUSLARARASI ARA\u015eTIRMA OTOR\u0130TES\u0130 (ISA) OLARAK EPO, BULU\u015e B\u00dcT\u00dcNL\u00dc\u011e\u00dc YOKSUNLU\u011eU” tab_id=”1609056711476-45f491da-d567″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Avrupa Patent Organizasyonu ve WIPO aras\u0131nda imzalanan 7 Ekim 1987 tarihli anla\u015fma, Uluslararas\u0131 Ara\u015ft\u0131rma s\u00fcrecinde EPO\u2019nun PCT k\u0131lavuzuna g\u00f6re hareket etmesi gerekti\u011fini belirten 2. maddesi dahil olmak \u00fczere, EPO Uluslararas\u0131 Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Otoritesi (ISA) olarak faaliyette bulunurken ve EPO Temyiz Kurullar\u0131 PCT madde 17(3)(a) h\u00fck\u00fcmleri nezdinde ek ara\u015ft\u0131rma har\u00e7lar\u0131na yap\u0131lan itirazlara karar verirken ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131d\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, bu k\u0131lavuzda da \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere, ba\u015fvurunun PCT Madde 17(3)(a) nezdinde, \u00f6nceden gelen ve sonradan gelen (yani \u00f6nceki teknik bilgi de g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak) bilgilere g\u00f6re, bulu\u015f b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015fart\u0131na uymad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilebilir. Ancak b\u00f6yle bir de\u011ferlendirmenin sadece prosed\u00fcrel etkisi (PCT Madde 17 ve Kural 40\u2019ta ortaya konan \u00f6zel prosed\u00fcr\u00fcn ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131) vard\u0131r ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla normal anlam\u0131yla bir \u201casli inceleme\u201d de\u011fildir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 2\/89: PCT, ULUSLARARASI ARA\u015eTIRMA OTOR\u0130TES\u0130 (ISA) OLARAK EPO, BULU\u015e B\u00dcT\u00dcNL\u00dc\u011e\u00dc YOKSUNLU\u011eU” tab_id=”1609056734066-93da3d3c-a921″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Uluslararas\u0131 Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Otoritesi (ISA) olarak hareket eden EPO, PCT Madde 17(3)(a) uyar\u0131nca, uluslararas\u0131 ba\u015fvurunun sonradan gelen bilgi \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bulu\u015f b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden yoksun olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi bir durumda ek bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma harc\u0131 talep edebilir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 3\/89 (G 11\/91): A\u015e\u0130KAR HATALAR” tab_id=”1609056750413-fb273015-8e47″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Avrupa patent ba\u015fvurusu ya da Avrupa patentinin a\u00e7\u0131klama ile ilgili k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131 (tarifname, istemler ve resimler), EPC Kural 139\u2019un ikinci c\u00fcmlesi uyar\u0131nca, sadece konuda uzman ki\u015finin bu belgelerin t\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn dosyalanm\u0131\u015f halinden kesin olarak ve yayg\u0131n genel bilgi kullanarak, nesnel bir bak\u0131\u015fla ve dosyalama tarihine g\u00f6reli olarak \u00e7\u0131karabilece\u011fi kapsamda de\u011fi\u015ftirilebilmektedir. Bu t\u00fcr bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik tamamen a\u00e7\u0131klay\u0131c\u0131 bir de\u011fi\u015fikliktir ve EPC madde 123(2) uyar\u0131nca koruma kapsam\u0131n\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesi yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etmemektedir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 1\/90: \u0130T\u0130RAZDAN CAYMA, \u0130T\u0130RAZ B\u0130R\u0130M\u0130 TARAFINDAN BEL\u0130RLENEN ZAMAN SINIRI, HAKLARIN KAYBI” tab_id=”1609056766560-86d27fb2-c839″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Gerek\u00e7e 8: EPC, \u0130tiraz Birimi taraf\u0131ndan belirlenen d\u00fczeltme ve g\u00f6zlem dosyalama i\u00e7in s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n (EPC Madde 101(1)) ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde hemen bir hak kayb\u0131na mahal vermez. Ayn\u0131 durum patentin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015f haliyle s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesinde gereken prosed\u00fcrel i\u015flemlerin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in s\u00fcre limiti i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erlidir (EPC Madde 101(3)(a); Kural 82).<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 2\/90″ tab_id=”1609056780321-d44fc139-184c”][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

EPC Madde 21(3)(c) uyar\u0131nca Hukuki Temyiz Kurulu d\u00f6rtten az \u00fcye i\u00e7eren bir \u0130nceleme Birimi\u2019nin ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararlara kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lan temyiz davalar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rmeye sadece s\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131n bir Avrupa patent ba\u015fvurusunun geri \u00e7evrilmesi veya bir Avrupa patentinin tescillenmesini ilgilendirmedi\u011fi durumlarda yetkilidir Di\u011fer t\u00fcm davalarda, yani EPC Madde 21(3)(a), (3)(b) ve (4) kapsam\u0131nda olan davalarda Teknik Temyiz Kurulu yetkilidir.<\/p><\/div>\n

EPC Madde 21(3) ve (4)\u2019te bulunan yetkiye dair h\u00fck\u00fcmler 1973 EPC Kural 9(3)\u2019ten etkilenmemektedir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 1\/91: \u0130T\u0130RAZDA BULU\u015e B\u00dcT\u00dcNL\u00dc\u011e\u00dc” tab_id=”1609056800215-2c316ebd-bd6a”][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Patentin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015f haliyle s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc durumlarda bir Avrupa patenti ve ilgili oldu\u011fu bulu\u015fun EPC Madde 101(3) uyar\u0131nca sa\u011flamas\u0131 gereken \u015fartlar\u0131n aras\u0131nda bulu\u015f b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc (EPC madde 82) yer almamaktad\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla tescil olan veya de\u011fi\u015ftirilen bir Avrupa patentinin b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fck \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 yerine getirip getirmedi\u011fi itiraz i\u015flemleri ile alakas\u0131zd\u0131r.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 2\/91: TEMY\u0130Z HARCININ GER\u0130 \u00d6DENMES\u0130, TEMY\u0130Z\u0130N TARAFI” tab_id=”1609056817082-39013f61-4625″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Temyize hakk\u0131 olan ancak temyiz etmeyen ve bunun yerine EPC Madde 107\u2019nin ikinci c\u00fcmlesi nezdinde temyiz i\u015flemlerinin taraf\u0131 olan bir ger\u00e7ek veya t\u00fczl ki\u015finin temyiz eden taraf\u0131n temyizi geri \u00e7ekmesi durumunda tek ba\u015f\u0131na i\u015flemleri devam ettirme hakk\u0131 yoktur.<\/p><\/div>\n

Temiz har\u00e7lar\u0131 sadece EPO\u2019da g\u00f6r\u00fclen i\u015flemlerin birden fazla taraf\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 karar i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli olarak temyiz davas\u0131 a\u00e7mas\u0131 nedeniyle geri \u00f6denmez.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 3\/91″ tab_id=”1609056854042-d4ace72e-d383″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
EPC Madde 157(2)(b) ve 158(2)\u2019ye uygun olarak, EPC Madde 122(5)\u2019in hem Madde 78(2) ve 79(2) i\u00e7in sa\u011flanan s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 hem de EPC Kural 104b(1)(b) ve (c) i\u00e7in sa\u011flanan s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 i\u00e7in uygulanabilirli\u011fi EPC 2000 ile ge\u00e7ersiz k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
\nG 4\/91: M\u00dcDAHALE, \u0130K\u0130 AYLIK TEMY\u0130Z S\u00dcRES\u0130 \u0130\u00c7\u0130NDE DOSYALANAN M\u00dcDAHALE<\/div>\n
\n

EPC Madde 105 uyar\u0131nca \u0130hlal ediyor oldu\u011fu iddia edilen taraf\u0131n itiraz i\u015flemlerine m\u00fcdahil olmas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6nko\u015ful olarak m\u00fcdahale bildirimini dosyaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 anda itiraz s\u00fcrecinin ge\u00e7erli olmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

\u0130tiraz birimi taraf\u0131ndan, itiraz taraf\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ortaya konan meselelere dair verilen bir karar nihai karard\u0131r; yani \u0130tiraz Birimi\u2019nin daha sonra karar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011fi\u015ftirmeye yetkisi yoktur.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

\u0130tiraz Birimi taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6r\u00fclen dosyalar b\u00f6yle bir nihai karar\u0131n \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 ile, bu karar\u0131n ne zaman y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girece\u011finden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak son bulur.<\/p><\/div>\n

\u0130tiraz Birimi taraf\u0131ndan nihai karar \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131ndan sonra, \u0130tiraz Birimi\u2019nce g\u00f6r\u00fclen itiraz dosyas\u0131n\u0131n taraflar\u0131ndan temyize ba\u015fvuran olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda, EPC Madde 108 nezdinde sunulan iki ayl\u0131k temyiz s\u00fcrecinde dosyalanan bir m\u00fcdahale bildiriminin hukuki bir etkisi yoktur.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 5\/91: TARAFLILIK, \u0130LK DERECE B\u0130R\u0130MLER\u0130” tab_id=”1609056916320-0a60ca97-a754″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

EPC Madde 24 sadece Temyiz Kurullar\u0131\u2019n\u0131n ve Geni\u015fletilmi\u015f Temyiz Kurulu\u2019nun \u00fcyeleri i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, tarafs\u0131zl\u0131k \u015fart\u0131 prensipte bir taraf\u0131n haklar\u0131n\u0131 etkileyen karar faaliyetlerinde bulunan EPO ilk derece birimleri \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131 i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erlidir.<\/p><\/div>\n

EPC nezdinde bir ilk derece biriminin, \u00f6rne\u011fin \u0130tiraz Birimi\u2019nin, bir \u00fcyesinin tarafl\u0131 oldu\u011fundan \u015f\u00fcphe duyuldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esi ile yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131 geri \u00e7evirme karar\u0131n\u0131 temyiz etmek i\u00e7in hukuki bir temel yoktur. Ancak EPC Madde 106(2) nezdinde \u0130tiraz Birimi\u2019ni olu\u015fturan ki\u015filerin tarafl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda, nihai bir karara veya ayr\u0131 bir temyize izin veren bir ara karara cevaben b\u00f6yle bir temyiz dosyalanabilir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 6\/91: \u0130LK \u0130\u015eLEM\u0130N ASL\u0130 \u00d6\u011eES\u0130” tab_id=”1609056880039-77df5caa-d465″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

EPC Madde 14(2)\u2019de at\u0131fta bulunulan ki\u015filer, ilk i\u015fleme dair asli \u00f6\u011feyi dosyalama, inceleme veya temyiz i\u015flemlerinde \u00fclkenin \u0130ngilizce, Frans\u0131zca veya Almanca d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki resmi dilinde dosyalarlarsa ve gerekli \u00e7eviriyi daha erken olmamak \u00fczere sunarlarsa EPC Kural 6(3) uyar\u0131nca har\u00e7 indirimine hak kazan\u0131rlar.<\/p><\/div>\n

Temyiz dosyalar\u0131nda ilk i\u015flemin asli \u00f6\u011fesi temyiz bildirimidir; bu nedenle har\u00e7 indirimine hak kazanmak i\u00e7in s\u00f6z konusu belgenin \u00fcye \u00fclkenin Avrupa Patent Ofisi\u2019nin resmi dili olmayan resmi dilinde dosyalanmas\u0131 ve EPO\u2019nun resmi dillerinden birine \u00e7evrilmesi temyiz gerek\u00e7eleri bildirimi gibi sonraki \u00f6\u011feler sadece EPO\u2019nun resmi dillerinden birinde dosyalansa bile yeterlidir (EPO \u0130nceleme K\u0131lavuzu A-XI 9.2).<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 7\/91: TEMY\u0130Z EDEN TEK TARAF, TEMY\u0130Z\u0130N GER\u0130 \u00c7EK\u0130LMES\u0130, \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 TARAFIN KEND\u0130 \u00d6NERGES\u0130” tab_id=”1609057061778-f1f2e7e6-6c81″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\u0130lk derecede itiraz konusu karara ba\u011flanan esas sorunlar ile ilgili olarak, e\u011fer ilk derecede temyiz eden taraf olan tek taraf temyizi geri \u00e7ekerse Temyiz Kurulu temyiz i\u015flemlerine devam edemez.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 8\/91: TEMY\u0130Z EDEN TEK TARAF, TEMY\u0130Z\u0130N GER\u0130 \u00c7EK\u0130LMES\u0130” tab_id=”1609057079755-2cb99ba2-4927″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\u0130lk derecede itiraz konusu karara ba\u011flanan esas sorunlar ile ilgili olarak, e\u011fer temyiz eden taraf olan tek taraf temyizi geri \u00e7ekerse temyiz dosyas\u0131na, hem tek tarafl\u0131 (ex parte) hem de kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 (inter partes) dosyalar i\u00e7in son verilir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 9\/91: \u0130T\u0130RAZ KAPSAMI” tab_id=”1609057094669-818b0394-a59a”][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Bir \u0130tiraz Birimi veya Temyiz Kurulu\u2019nun EPC madde 101 ve 102 nezdinde bir Avrupa patentini inceleme ve muhafaza edilmesine karar verme yetkisi patente dosyalanan itiraz bildiriminde ne kapsamda itiraz edildi\u011fi ile do\u011frudan ilgilidir. Ancak itiraz veya temyiz i\u015flemlerine konu olan bir ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z isteme ba\u011fl\u0131 istem konusu hususlar bu hususlara a\u00e7\u0131k olarak itiraz edilmemi\u015f olsa bile e\u011fer h\u00e2lihaz\u0131rda var olan bilgi \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ilk bak\u0131\u015fta ge\u00e7erlilikleri konusunda \u015f\u00fcpheye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcyorsa patentlenebilirlik a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan incelenebilir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 10\/91: \u0130T\u0130RAZ KAPSAMI, \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 TARAFIN KEND\u0130 \u00d6NERGES\u0130, TEMY\u0130Z \u0130\u00c7\u0130N YEN\u0130 GEREK\u00c7ELER” tab_id=”1609057111176-69d2927f-44e5″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Bir \u0130tiraz Birimi veya Temyiz Kurulu\u2019nun itiraz kapsam\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanan itiraz gerek\u00e7elerinin \u00f6tesinde, EPC madde 100\u2019de tan\u0131ml\u0131 t\u00fcm itiraz gerek\u00e7elerini de\u011ferlendirme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yoktur.<\/p><\/div>\n

Prensipte \u0130tiraz Birimi sadece do\u011fru ve yeterli olarak sunulmu\u015f ve EPC Madde 99(1) ve Kural 76(2)(c) nezdinde do\u011frulanm\u0131\u015f itiraz gerek\u00e7elerini inceleyecektir. \u0130stisnai olarak \u0130tiraz Birimi EPC madde 114(1)\u2019i uygulayarak, ilk bak\u0131\u015fta b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle veya k\u0131smi olarak Avrupa patentinin muhafaza edilmesine engel te\u015fkil eden di\u011fer itiraz gerek\u00e7elerini de\u011ferlendirebilir.
\n\u0130tiraz i\u00e7in yeni gerek\u00e7eler temyiz i\u015flemlerinde sadece patent sahibinin onay\u0131 ile de\u011ferlendirilebilir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 12\/91: KARARLAR, D\u00c2H\u0130L\u0130 POSTA SERV\u0130S\u0130” tab_id=”1609057130140-29d11b61-b0b0″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Yaz\u0131l\u0131 i\u015flemleri takip eden karar verme s\u00fcreci bildirim karar\u0131n\u0131n karar veren b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn formalite k\u0131sm\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan EPO posta servisine verildi\u011fi tarihte tamamlan\u0131r.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Gerek\u00e7e 2: \u0130\u015flemler s\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc zaman karar s\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak verilebilmektedir. Karar, s\u00f6ylenmi\u015f olmas\u0131 ile y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girer. Bu an\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 i\u015flemlerdeki e\u015fde\u011feri karar\u0131n bildiriminin \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 and\u0131r. Karar a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131ktan ve i\u015flemlerde bildirimi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftikten sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girer ve karar\u0131n sah\u015fb\u015f birim dahil olmak \u00fczere de\u011fi\u015ftirilemez.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Gerek\u00e7e 2: Bir karar karar\u0131 yay\u0131nlayan b\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan sadece taraflardan biri makul ve kapsaml\u0131 bir temyiz dosyalarsa EPC Madde 109 uyar\u0131nca ara g\u00f6zden ge\u00e7irme yap\u0131larak geri al\u0131nabilir.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Gerek\u00e7e 3: S\u00f6zl\u00fc i\u015flemlerde, taraflar\u0131n tart\u0131\u015fma sona erdikten sonra sunduklar\u0131 belgeler, karar veren birimin taraflar\u0131n belli bir zaman diliminde yorum sunmas\u0131na izin verdi\u011fi veya sorunlar\u0131 ek olarak tart\u0131\u015fmak i\u00e7in s\u00f6zl\u00fc i\u015flemleri yeniden ba\u015flatmaya karar verdi\u011fi durumlar hari\u00e7 olmqk \u00fczere g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilmelidir.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Gerek\u00e7e 6: \u2026 karar \u00fczerine damgalanm\u0131\u015f tarih, taraflar\u0131n hala de\u011ferlendirilmeye a\u00e7\u0131k yeni i\u00e7erik sunmas\u0131na uygun bir zaman olarak de\u011ferlendirilemez.<\/p><\/div>\n

Gerek\u00e7e 9.1: Dahili EPO talimatlar\u0131 karar\u0131n damgaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih ile g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi tarih aras\u0131nda 3 g\u00fcnl\u00fck bir s\u00fcrenin her zaman ge\u00e7ti\u011fini belirtmektedir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu tarihi belirlemek hem EPO hem de taraflar i\u00e7in olduk\u00e7a kolayd\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, bir karar\u0131n bildirilmesinin sa\u011flamas\u0131 gereken hukuki kesinlik \u015fart\u0131 yerine getirilmektedir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 1\/92: \u00dcR\u00dcN KOMPOZ\u0130SYONU, \u00d6NCEK\u0130 KULLANIM, A\u00c7IKLAMA KAPSAMI” tab_id=”1609057149964-0b6e0ac3-4550″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Bir \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn kimyasal kompozisyonu, bu \u00fcr\u00fcn kamunun ula\u015f\u0131m\u0131na a\u00e7\u0131k ve konuda uzman ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan analiz edilip yeniden \u00fcretilebiliyorsa, kompozisyonun analiz edilmesi i\u00e7in belirli nedenlerin belirlenebilip belirlenememesine ba\u011fl\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n tekni\u011fin bilinen durumuna aittir.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Ayn\u0131 prensip ayn\u0131 nispetle uygulanmak \u00fczere herhangi ba\u015fka bir \u00fcr\u00fcn i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erlidir.<\/p><\/div>\n

Gerek\u00e7e 3: \u2026ticari olarak elde edilebilen bir \u00fcr\u00fcn \u00fcst\u00fc kapal\u0131 olarak kompozisyonu veya i\u00e7 yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6tesinde bir bilgi a\u00e7\u0131klamaz. \u0130kincil nitelikler sadece belli bir etki veya sonu\u00e7 elde etmek veya olas\u0131 sonu\u00e7lar ve yetiler ke\u015ffetmek i\u00e7in \u00fcr\u00fcn \u00f6zellikle se\u00e7ilmi\u015f ko\u015fullara maruz b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar [] ve tasarlanarak belirlenen se\u00e7imlere ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131 olduklar\u0131ndan bu ko\u015fullara \u00f6zel olarak belirlenebilir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 2\/92″ tab_id=”1609057173732-d93b8750-12ca”][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Bulu\u015f b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc olmayan bir ba\u015fvuru i\u00e7in, EPC Kural 64(1)) uyar\u0131nca Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Birimi taraf\u0131ndan talep edilen gerekli ek ara\u015ft\u0131rma har\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6demeyen ba\u015fvuru sahibi, ba\u015fvuruya konu olan ancak ara\u015ft\u0131rma har\u00e7lar\u0131 \u00f6denmemi\u015f hususlara dair bir ba\u015fvuruyu s\u00fcrd\u00fcremez. Ba\u015fvuru sahibi, e\u011fer bu hususlar\u0131 koruma alt\u0131na almak istiyorsa, bir b\u00f6l\u00fcnm\u00fc\u015f ba\u015fvuru dosyalamal\u0131d\u0131r (Ayr\u0131ca bkz. 2000 EPC kural 137(4)).<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 3\/92: GASP ED\u0130C\u0130 OR\u0130J\u0130NAL BA\u015eVURU, BA\u015eVURU YAPMA YETK\u0130S\u0130” tab_id=”1609057200659-e8b3a4df-0d4d”][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Ulusal bir mahkemenin nihai karar\u0131 ile bir Avrupa patentinin tescili i\u00e7in ba\u015fvuru sahibinden ba\u015fka bir ki\u015finin yetki sahibi oldu\u011fu h\u00fckm\u00fcne var\u0131ld\u0131ysa ve o ki\u015fi EPC Madde 61(1)\u2019in \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 yerine getirerek ayn\u0131 bulu\u015f i\u00e7in EPC Madde 61(1)(b) uyar\u0131nca yeni bir Avrupa patent ba\u015fvurusu dosyalarsa, yeni ba\u015fvuru dosyaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 zaman \u00f6nceki patent gasp\u0131na konu ba\u015fvurunun hala EPO nezdinde inceleme s\u00fcrecinde olmas\u0131, yeni ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilmesi i\u00e7in bir \u00f6n ko\u015ful de\u011fildir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 4\/92: S\u00d6ZL\u00dc \u0130\u015eLEMLERDE DURU\u015eMAYA GELMEMEK, YEN\u0130 KANITLARA DAYALI KARAR” tab_id=”1609057218197-cba56f0a-5581″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
S\u00f6zl\u00fc i\u015flemlerde kat\u0131l\u0131m \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131 uygun bi\u00e7imde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen ancak duru\u015fmaya gelmeyen taraf\u0131n aleyhine bir karar, ilk olarak sadece s\u00f6z konusu duru\u015fmada ortaya konan kan\u0131tlara dayanarak al\u0131namaz.<\/div>\n
Benzer \u015fekilde, \u00f6nceden bildirilmeyen ve sadece kan\u0131tlar\u0131 sunan taraf\u0131n iddialar\u0131n\u0131 destekleyen yeni kan\u0131tlar dikkate al\u0131namaz. \u00d6te yandan yeni kan\u0131tlar prensipte karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7elerini desteklemek i\u00e7in kullan\u0131labilir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 9\/92, G 4\/93: TEMY\u0130Z EDEN TEK TARAFIN PATENT SAH\u0130B\u0130 TARAF OLMASI, HAK BAKIMINDAN TARAF OLMA HAL\u0130, KAR\u015eI TEMY\u0130Z OLMAMASI” tab_id=”1609057236968-214bb18b-bf15″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

E\u011fer patent sahibi bir patentin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015f haliyle s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesine dair bir ara karar\u0131 temyiz eden tek taraf ise, ne Temyiz Kurulu ne de EPC madde 107\u2019nin 2. c\u00fcmlesi uyar\u0131nca temyizde hak bak\u0131m\u0131ndan taraf olan stat\u00fcs\u00fcnde olup temyiz etmeyen taraf, ara karar g\u00f6re de\u011fi\u015ftirilen patentin s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesine itiraz edemez.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

E\u011fer ilgili taraf bir patentin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015f haliyle s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesine dair bir ara karar\u0131 temyiz eden tek taraf ise, patent sahibinin yetkisi temyiz s\u00fcrecinde patentin \u0130tiraz Birimi\u2019nin ara karar\u0131 ile s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclen halini savunmakla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131d\u0131r. EPC Madde 107\u2019nin 2. c\u00fcmlesi uyar\u0131nca temyizde taraf olan patent sahibinin sundu\u011fu de\u011fi\u015fiklikler, ne uygun ne de gerekli olduklar\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle Temyiz Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan reddedilebilir.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Gerek\u00e7e 10: \u2026 E\u011fer bir taraf ilk derecede \u00e7\u0131kan bir karar\u0131 temyiz s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde temyiz etmezse, o taraf, zaman a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n, temyiz eden taraf\u0131n talepleri ile ayn\u0131 kapsamda talepler sunma ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla temyiz eden taraf yerine ge\u00e7me hakk\u0131n\u0131 talep edemez.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Gerek\u00e7e 10: \u2026 Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla temyiz s\u00fcrecinde temyiz etmeyen taraflar taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n a\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan sonra dosyalanan ve EPC Madde 64(b) uyar\u0131nca temyiz eden taraf\u0131n orijinal temyiz talebinin \u00f6tesine ge\u00e7en talepler ge\u00e7erli de\u011fildir.<\/p><\/div>\n

Gerek\u00e7e 10: EPC temyiz etmeyen temyiz taraf\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz etmesi halini tan\u0131mlamamaktad\u0131r.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 1\/93: 123(2)(3) TUZA\u011eI, 123(3)\u2019\u00dcN ALTINDA YATAN D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcNCE, HAKSIZ AVANTAJ\/TEKN\u0130K KATKI,DE\u011e\u0130\u015e\u0130KL\u0130KLER\u0130N SORUMLULU\u011eU” tab_id=”1609057253142-5877b731-6335″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

E\u011fer bir Avrupa patenti tescil olmu\u015f halinde EPC 123(2) \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde dosyalanan ba\u015fvurunun i\u00e7eri\u011finin \u00f6tesine ge\u00e7en ve patent taraf\u0131ndan sunulan koruma kapsam\u0131n\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlayan hususlar i\u00e7eriyorsa, bu patent itiraz s\u00fcrecinde de\u011fi\u015ftirilmeden muhafaza edilemez \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc itiraz gerek\u00e7eleri EPC Madde 100(c) nezdinde patentin muhafaza edilmesini tehlikeye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcr. Patent bu t\u00fcr s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 hususlar\u0131n istemden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 ile de de\u011fi\u015ftirilemez \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc b\u00f6yle bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik sunulan koruma kapsam\u0131n\u0131 geni\u015fletmektedir ve bu EPC Madde 123(3) taraf\u0131ndan yasaklanmaktad\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu patent, sadece ba\u015fvurunun dosyalanan halinde EPC Madde 123(3)\u2019\u00fc ihlal etmeden bu t\u00fcr hususlar\u0131 de\u011fi\u015ftirmek i\u00e7in bir dayanak var ise muhafaza edilebilir.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Patentin dosyalanan halinde a\u00e7\u0131klanmayan ama inceleme s\u0131ras\u0131nda ba\u015fvuruya eklenen ve istem konusu bulu\u015fun hususlar\u0131na teknik katk\u0131 sa\u011flamadan tescilli patentin sundu\u011fu korumay\u0131, patentin dosyalanan halinde istem konusu bulu\u015fun bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n korumas\u0131n\u0131 harici tutarak k\u0131s\u0131tlayan bir unsur, EPC Madde 123(2) nezdinde patentin dosyalanan halinin i\u00e7eri\u011fini a\u015fan hususlar olarak de\u011ferlendirilmeyecektir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla EPC Madde 100(c) nezdinde itiraz gerek\u00e7esi, b\u00f6yle bir unsur i\u00e7eren bir Avrupa patentinin muhafaza edilmesini tehlikeye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmez.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Gerek\u00e7e 9: EPC madde 123(2)\u2019nin alt\u0131nda yatan d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceye g\u00f6re ba\u015fvuru sahibinin patentin dosyalanan halinde a\u00e7\u0131klanmayan hususlar\u0131 metne ekleyerek pozisyonunu g\u00fc\u00e7lendirmesine izin verilmemelidir; zira bu ba\u015fvuru sahibine haks\u0131z avantaj sa\u011flayacak ve orijinal ba\u015fvurunun i\u00e7eri\u011fine dayanan \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerin hukuki g\u00fcvenli\u011fine zarar verecektir. EPC Madde 123(3)\u2019\u00fcn amac\u0131, tescillenmi\u015f bir patentin istemlerinin geni\u015fletilmesini, ba\u015fvurunun dosyalanm\u0131\u015f halinde b\u00f6yle bir geni\u015fletme i\u00e7in temel oldu\u011fu durumlarda bile engelleyerek \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerin \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n\u0131 korumakt\u0131r.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Gerek\u00e7e 16: Tescillenen patentin sundu\u011fu koruma kapsam\u0131n\u0131 daraltan ve orijinal ba\u015fvuruda a\u00e7\u0131klanmam\u0131\u015f ve ba\u015fvuru tarihi itibar\u0131 ile bulu\u015fun kapsam\u0131nda say\u0131lamayacak bir unsurun eklenmesinin EPC Madde 123(3)\u2019\u00fcn ba\u015fvuru sahibinin uygun olarak a\u00e7\u0131klanmayan bir \u015fey i\u00e7in patent korumas\u0131 elde ederek haks\u0131z avantaja sahip olmas\u0131n\u0131 engelleme amac\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumun ko\u015fullar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. E\u011fer b\u00f6yle bir ek unsur, patent taraf\u0131ndan sa\u011flanan koruma kapsam\u0131n\u0131 daraltmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen istem konusu bulu\u015fun hususlar\u0131na bir teknik katk\u0131 sa\u011fl\u0131yorsa, patent sahibine EPC Madde 123(3)\u2019\u00fcn yukar\u0131da verilen amac\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak [\u2026] haks\u0131z avantaj sa\u011flamaktad\u0131r.<\/p><\/div>\n

Gerek\u00e7e 13: Bir patent ba\u015fvurusu (veya bir patente) yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fikliklerin nihai sorumlulu\u011fu ba\u015fvuru sahibine (ya da patent sahibine) aittir (bkz. G 1\/93 karar\u0131n\u0131n ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zetlendi\u011fi ve \u201cif\u015faat\/disclosure\u201d ile ilgili di\u011fer kararlarla kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 G 2\/10 Gerek\u00e7e 4.3).<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 2\/93: H\u00dcCRE K\u00dcLT\u00dcR\u00dc \u00d6RNE\u011e\u0130” tab_id=”1609057272746-1c8dda24-d038″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
EPC Kural 31(2) uyar\u0131nca bir h\u00fccre k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fc \u00f6rne\u011fi dosya numaras\u0131 ile ilgili bilgiler belirtilen s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n a\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan sonra sunulamaz.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 3\/93: ARA BELGE, AYNI BULU\u015e” tab_id=”1609057289396-6bd11365-f009″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

R\u00fc\u00e7han s\u00fcresinde yay\u0131nlanan ve teknik i\u00e7eri\u011fi r\u00fc\u00e7han belgesine tekab\u00fcl eden bir belge, EPC Madde 52(4) uyar\u0131nca at\u0131f yap\u0131labilecek \u00f6nceki teknik bilgisi kapsam\u0131na girmektedir. Bu durumda r\u00fc\u00e7han hakk\u0131 talebinin ge\u00e7erli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p><\/div>\n

Bu husus ayr\u0131ca bir r\u00fc\u00e7han talebinin Avrupa ba\u015fvurusunda r\u00fc\u00e7han ba\u015fvurusunda a\u00e7\u0131klanmayan hususlar\u0131n istem konusu olmas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan r\u00fc\u00e7han ba\u015fvurusu ile m\u00fcteakip Avrupa ba\u015fvurusunun ayn\u0131 bulu\u015f ile ilgili olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu durumlar i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erlidir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 5\/93″ tab_id=”1609057305843-5de648ce-2956″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
EPC Madde 122(5) nezdindeki h\u00fck\u00fcmler, EPC Madde 157(2)(b) ve 158(2) ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak EPC Kural 104b(1)(b)(i) ve (ii)\u2019de sa\u011flanan s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erlidir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 7\/93: KURAL 71(3) YAZI\u015eMASINDAN SONRA DE\u011e\u0130\u015e\u0130KL\u0130K” tab_id=”1609057508598-1a5a0357-01d6″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Ba\u015fvuru sahibi taraf\u0131ndan EPC Kural 71(3) uyar\u0131nca sunulan bir metnin onaylanmas\u0131n\u0131n, EPC Kural 71(6) uyar\u0131nca bir yaz\u0131\u015fma \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131ktan sonra ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 kalmaz. \u0130nceleme Birimi\u2019nin EPC Kural 71(6) uyar\u0131nca b\u00f6yle bir yaz\u0131\u015fma \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131ndan itibaren patentin tescil karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131na kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde ba\u015fvurunun de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesine izin verilip verilmeyece\u011fini takdir yetkisi vard\u0131r.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

\u0130nceleme Birimi, EPC Kural 71(6) uyar\u0131nca b\u00f6yle bir yaz\u0131\u015fma \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131ndan sonra takdir yetkisini kullan\u0131rken konuyla ilgili t\u00fcm fakt\u00f6rleri de\u011ferlendirmelidir. \u0130nceleme Birimi \u00f6zellikle ba\u015fvuru sahibinin se\u00e7ilen \u00fclkelerin t\u00fcm\u00fcnde ge\u00e7erli olan bir patent elde etme \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131n\u0131 ve EPO\u2019nun, patentin tescil karar\u0131n\u0131 yay\u0131nlayarak inceleme s\u00fcrecini sona erdirme \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeli ve dengelemelidir. EPC Kural 71(6) uyar\u0131nca \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan yaz\u0131\u015fman\u0131n alt\u0131nda yatan amaca referansla \u00f6nceden onaylanm\u0131\u015f metin baz\u0131nda tescil s\u00fcrecini sona erdirme durumu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurularak tescil s\u00fcrecinin son a\u015famas\u0131nda yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklik talebine izin verilmesi istisnai bir durum olacakt\u0131r.<\/p><\/div>\n

EPC Kural 167(2)\u2019ye tabi gerek\u00e7eler EPC\u2019nin EPC Madde 96(2) uyar\u0131nca uyulmas\u0131 gereken \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 te\u015fkil etmemektedir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 8\/93: TEMY\u0130Z EDEN TEK TARAF OLAN TARAFIN TEMY\u0130Z\u0130 GER\u0130 \u00c7EKMES\u0130” tab_id=”1609057535488-5069d775-ea95″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Temyiz eden tek taraf olan taraf\u0131n, itiraz\u0131n\u0131 geri \u00e7ekti\u011fini belirten bir bildirim yapmas\u0131, patent sahibinin temyizin sonlanmas\u0131n\u0131 onaylay\u0131p onaylamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak ve Temyiz Kurulu\u2019nun g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc EPC nezdinde patentin muhafaza edilmesi i\u00e7in gerekli \u015fartlar\u0131n sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde olsa bile temyiz s\u00fcrecine hemen ve otomatik olarak son verir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 9\/93: KEND\u0130NE \u0130T\u0130RAZ DOSYALANMASI” tab_id=”1609057550617-12dbebe8-69d3″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Bir Avrupa patentine, o patentin sahibi taraf\u0131ndan itiraz edilemez (G 1\/84 karar\u0131 ge\u00e7ersiz k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r).<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 10\/93: \u0130NCELEMEDEN SONRA TEMY\u0130Z” tab_id=”1609057564437-08863baa-4fc7″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Bir inceleme biriminin bir Avrupa patent ba\u015fvurusunu reddetti\u011fi bir karar\u0131n temyizinde, temyiz kurulunun s\u00f6z konusu ba\u015fvuru veya bulu\u015fun EPC \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 yerine getirip getirmedi\u011fini inceleme yetkisi vard\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 durum inceleme biriminin inceleme s\u00fcrecinde dikkate almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya yerine getirildi\u011fini kabul etti\u011fi \u015fartlar i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erlidir. E\u011fer bir \u015fart\u0131n yerine getirilmedi\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmek i\u00e7in neden varsa, kurul bu gerek\u00e7eyi temyiz dosyas\u0131na ekleyecektir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 1\/94: TEMY\u0130ZDE M\u00dcDAHALE, \u0130T\u0130RAZ GEREK\u00c7ELER\u0130” tab_id=”1609057579191-706a0f58-8407″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

\u0130hlal etti\u011fi iddia edilen bir ki\u015finin beklemede olan temyiz s\u00fcrecine EPC Madde 105 nezdinde m\u00fcdahalesine izin verilmektedir ve m\u00fcdahale EPC Madde 100 nezdindeki herhangi bir itiraz gerek\u00e7esine dayal\u0131 olabilir.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Gerek\u00e7e 13: \u2026 \u00e7ok tarafl\u0131 (inter partes) temyiz s\u00fcrecinin amac\u0131 as\u0131l olarak kaybeden tarafa \u0130tiraz Birimi\u2019nin karar\u0131n\u0131 karar\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fc \u00fczerinden tart\u0131\u015fma imkan\u0131 vermektir ve s\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131n dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz gerek\u00e7elerini de\u011ferlendirmek belirtilen ama\u00e7la uyumlu de\u011fildir (G 10\/91).<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

\u2026 m\u00fcdahalenin amac\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fi iddia edilen ki\u015finin, patent sahibinin davas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 kendini savunmas\u0131na izin vermektir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, ihlal etmekle su\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131 patente sald\u0131rmak i\u00e7in, ger\u00e7ek itiraz sahibi taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f EPC Madde 100 nezdinde yeni itiraz gerek\u00e7eleri sunmak dahil her yolu kullanmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemek bu m\u00fcdahalenin amac\u0131na ters d\u00fc\u015fmektedir.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

\u2026 Geni\u015fletilmi\u015f Kurul, beklemede olan temyiz s\u00fcre\u00e7lerine EPC Madde 105 nezdinde yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin EPC Madde 100 nezdindeki herhangi bir itiraz gerek\u00e7esine dayanabilece\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne varmaktad\u0131r.<\/p><\/div>\n

\u2026 bildirilenlerin uygulamas\u0131nda \u2026 s\u0131radan temyiz s\u00fcrecine yeni gerek\u00e7eler eklenmesi gibi istisnai bir duruma sahip G 10\/91 dosyas\u0131nda, e\u011fer m\u00fcdahale eden taraf yeni bir itiraz gerek\u00e7esi sunarsa, tersini yapmak i\u00e7in \u00f6zel nedenlerin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda (\u00f6r. patent sahibinin o \u015fekilde tercih etmedi\u011fi durumlar), dosya tekrar g\u00f6r\u00fclmek \u00fczere ilk derece birimine iade edilmelidir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 2\/94: E\u015eL\u0130K EDEN K\u0130\u015e\u0130LER, TEK TARAFLI (EX PARTE) S\u00dcRE\u00c7LER” tab_id=”1609057604555-6927e551-74d8″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Bir temyiz kurulu, profesyonel vekilin bir taraf\u0131 tam yetkiyle temsil etmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda, ilave bir \u015fahs\u0131n (EPC Madde 134(1) veya (7) nezdinde taraflar\u0131 temsil etme yetkisi olmayan bir ki\u015fi) tek tarafl\u0131 s\u00fcre\u00e7lerin s\u00f6zl\u00fc duru\u015fmalar\u0131nda sunum yapmas\u0131na izin vermeyi takdir yetkisine sahiptir.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Tek tarafl\u0131 s\u00fcre\u00e7lerde profesyonel vekil, s\u00f6zl\u00fc duru\u015fman\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fclece\u011fi g\u00fcnden \u00f6nce bu t\u00fcr s\u00f6zl\u00fc sunumlar\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in izin istemelidir. Bu talep, izin istenen ki\u015finin ad\u0131, vas\u0131flar\u0131 ve ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclecek s\u00f6zl\u00fc sunumlar\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fini belirtmelidir.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Temyiz kurulu takdir yetkisini her dosyan\u0131n kendi \u015fartlar\u0131na g\u00f6re kullanmal\u0131d\u0131r. De\u011ferlendirilmesi gereken as\u0131l k\u0131stas \u015fudur: kurul karar\u0131na varmadan \u00f6nce, sunulacak b\u00fct\u00fcn hususlar hakk\u0131nda etrafl\u0131ca bilgilendirilmelidir. Kurul, belgelerin e\u015flik eden ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan profesyonel vekilin sorumlulu\u011fu ve kontrol\u00fc alt\u0131nda sunuldu\u011funa tatmin olmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Tek tarafl\u0131 (Ex parte) veya \u00e7ok tarafl\u0131 (inter partes) temyiz s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinde, bir temyiz kurulu, eski bir temyiz kurulu \u00fcyesinin s\u00f6z konusu duru\u015fmada s\u00f6zl\u00fc sunum yapmas\u0131na, s\u00f6z konusu eski \u00fcyenin temyiz kurullar\u0131ndaki g\u00f6revinin bitmesinin \u00fczerinden yeterince zaman ge\u00e7ti\u011finin ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu s\u00f6zl\u00fc belgelerin sunulmas\u0131 sonucu temyiz kurulunun tarafs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u015f\u00fcphe duyulmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n takdir edildi\u011fi durumlar hari\u00e7, izin vermemelidir.<\/p><\/div>\n

Bir temyiz kurulu normalde tek tarafl\u0131 (Ex parte) veya \u00e7ok tarafl\u0131 (inter partes) temyiz s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinde, eski bir temyiz kurulu \u00fcyesinin s\u00f6z konusu duru\u015fmada s\u00f6zl\u00fc sunum yapmas\u0131na, s\u00f6z konusu eski \u00fcyenin temyiz kurullar\u0131ndaki g\u00f6revinin bitmesinin \u00fczerinden en az 3 sene ge\u00e7tikten sonra izin vermelidir. \u00dc\u00e7 sene ge\u00e7tikten sonra \u00e7ok \u00f6zel durumlar hari\u00e7 izin verilmelidir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 1\/95: YEN\u0130 \u0130T\u0130RAZ GEREK\u00c7ELER\u0130” tab_id=”1609057627144-202196a1-0936″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Bir patente EPC Madde 100(a)\u2019da belirtilen gerek\u00e7eler ile itiraz edildi\u011fi ama itiraz\u0131n sadece yenilik ve bulu\u015f basama\u011f\u0131 yoksunlu\u011fu zeminlerinde gerek\u00e7elendirildi\u011fi bir itirazlarda, EPC Madde 52(1) ve (2) nezdindeki patentlenemeyen hususlar gerek\u00e7esi yeni bir itiraz gerek\u00e7esidir ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak patent sahibinin onay\u0131 olmadan temyiz s\u00fcrecinde kullan\u0131lamaz.
\nGerek\u00e7e 4.4: Bir itiraz\u0131n EPC Madde 100(a) \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde kabul edilebilir olmas\u0131 i\u00e7in, itiraz\u0131n hukuki gerek\u00e7elerinden en az birine, yani EPC Madde 52 ila 57\u2019de belirtilen itiraz gerek\u00e7elerinden en az birine dayan\u0131yor olmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 2\/95″ tab_id=”1609057645658-efe52190-e362″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Avrupa patent ba\u015fvurusunu olu\u015fturan t\u00fcm belgeler, yani tarifname, istemler ve resimler, EPC Kural 139 nezdinde bir de\u011fi\u015fiklikle ba\u015fvuru sahibinin tescil talebiyle dosyalamaya niyetlendi\u011fi ba\u015fka belgeler ile de\u011fi\u015ftirilemez.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 3\/95″ tab_id=”1609057670792-1844f374-c509″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

T 356\/93 karar\u0131nda (OJ EPO 1995, 545) farkl\u0131, kararl\u0131, herbisite dayan\u0131kl\u0131 genetik \u00f6zelliklere sahip genetik olarak oynanm\u0131\u015f bitkilere dair bir isteme EPC 53(b) nezdinde izin verilemeyece\u011fine kanaat getirilmi\u015ftir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc istem konusu genetik oynama nedeniyle \u00fczerinde oynanm\u0131\u015f veya de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015f bitki EPC Madde 53(b) \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde bir \u201cbitki t\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fcr\u201d.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Bu kanaat T 49\/83 (OJ EPO 1984, 112) veya T 19\/90 (OJ EPO 1990, 476) dosyalar\u0131ndaki kararlarla \u00e7eli\u015fkili de\u011fildir.<\/p><\/div>\n

Bu nedenle, EPO Ba\u015fkan\u0131\u2019n\u0131n, Geni\u015fletilmi\u015f Temyiz Kurulu\u2019na y\u00f6nlendirdi\u011fi \u201cBelirli bitki veya hayvan t\u00fcrlerinin tek tek a\u00e7\u0131klanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bitkiler veya hayvanlar ile ilgili bir istem, e\u011fer bitki veya hayvan t\u00fcrlerini kaps\u0131yorsa EPC Madde 53(b)\u2019de ortaya konulan patentlenme engelini ihlal eder mi?\u201d sorusuna EPC Madde 112(1)(b) uyar\u0131nca izin verilmemektedir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 4\/95: E\u015eL\u0130K EDEN K\u0130\u015e\u0130LER, DURU\u015eMALAR” tab_id=”1609057689992-eea2f09e-1b6e”][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\u0130tiraz veya itiraz\u0131 temyiz s\u00fcre\u00e7leri ba\u011flam\u0131nda EPC Madde 116 nezdinde duru\u015fmalarda bir taraf\u0131 temsil eden profesyonel vekile e\u015flik eden ki\u015filerin, EPC Madde 117 aksine, taraf\u0131n savlar\u0131n\u0131n profesyonel vekil taraf\u0131ndan sunulmas\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131nda, e\u015flik eden \u015fahs\u0131n o taraf ad\u0131na belirli hukuki ya da teknik konularla ilgili a\u00e7\u0131klamalar yapmas\u0131na izin verilmektedir.
\nBu t\u00fcr s\u00f6zl\u00fc sunumlar bir hak de\u011fildir ve sadece EPO\u2019nun izni ve takdiriyle yap\u0131labilir.<\/div>\n
EPO, itiraz veya itiraz temyiz s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinde e\u015flik eden bir \u015fahs\u0131n s\u00f6zl\u00fc sunum yapma takdir yetkisini kullan\u0131rken a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da verilen ana k\u0131stas\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmelidir:<\/div>\n
(i) Profesyonel vekil, bu t\u00fcr bir sunum i\u00e7in izin talep etmelidir. Bu talepte e\u015flik eden ki\u015finin ad\u0131 ve vas\u0131flar\u0131 ve ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclecek s\u00f6zl\u00fc sunumun i\u00e7eri\u011fi belirtilmelidir.
\n(ii) Talep, kar\u015f\u0131 taraflar\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclecek a\u00e7\u0131klamalara g\u00f6re haz\u0131rl\u0131k yapabilmesi i\u00e7in duru\u015fmadan yeterince \u00f6nce sunulmal\u0131d\u0131r.
\n(iii) \u0130stisnai bir durum olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece, veya kar\u015f\u0131 taraflar\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn sunum yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 kabul etti\u011fi durumlar hari\u00e7, duru\u015fmadan k\u0131sa bir zaman \u00f6nce veya duru\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan talepler reddedilmelidir.
\n(iv) EPO, e\u015flik eden ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan sunulan a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n profesyonel vekilin devam eden sorumlulu\u011fu ve kontrol\u00fc alt\u0131nda sunuldu\u011funa emin olmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/div>\n
EPC \u00fcyesi olmayan \u00fclkelerin kalifiye patent avukatlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan sunulan s\u00f6zl\u00fc belgeler i\u00e7in \u00f6zel k\u0131staslar yoktur.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 6\/95″ tab_id=”1609057739498-f4a759e2-a5c0″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
1973 EPC Kural 71a(1) temyiz kurullar\u0131 i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli de\u011fildir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 7\/95, (G 1\/95)” tab_id=”1609057755426-624c12ef-ec88″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Bir patente EPC Madde 100(a) nezdinde itiraz bildiriminde yer alan belgeler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bulu\u015f basama\u011f\u0131ndan yoksun oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esi ile itiraz edildi\u011fi durumlarda, EPC Madde 52(1) ve 54 nezdindeki yanilik yoksunlu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esi yeni bir itiraz gerek\u00e7esi te\u015fkil eder ve bu nedenle temyiz s\u00fcrecinde patent sahibinin onay\u0131 olmadan kullan\u0131lamaz. Ancak, istemlerin en yak\u0131n teknik belge \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda yenilikten yoksun oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131, bulu\u015f basama\u011f\u0131 yoksunlu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esinin de\u011ferlendirilmesi ba\u011flam\u0131nda g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulabilir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 8\/95″ tab_id=”1609057788886-30efb936-c52a”][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\u0130nceleme Birimi\u2019nin EPC Kural 139 nezdinde tescil karar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi talebini reddetme karar\u0131n\u0131n temyizine teknik temyiz kurulu taraf\u0131ndan karar verilecektir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 2\/97: \u0130Y\u0130 N\u0130YET” tab_id=”1609057806228-f45fb001-94e2″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\u0130yi niyet prensibi, e\u011fer temyiz bildirimi temyiz eden taraf\u0131n temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131 zaman\u0131nda \u00f6deyebilece\u011fi kadar erken dosyaland\u0131ysa ve e\u011fer ne temyiz bildiriminde ne de temyiz ile alakal\u0131 olarak dosyalanan di\u011fer belgelerde temyiz eden taraf\u0131n e\u011fer hat\u0131rlat\u0131lmazsa har\u00e7 \u00f6deme zaman\u0131n\u0131 ka\u00e7\u0131raca\u011f\u0131na dair bir belirti yoksa, temyiz kuruluna temyiz eden bir tarafa temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n eksik oldu\u011funu bildirme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc dayatmaz.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 1\/97″ tab_id=”1609057828350-1a4b9776-949d”][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Avrupa Patent S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ba\u011flam\u0131nda, temel bir prosed\u00fcrel prensibin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ve temyiz kurulunun ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kesin h\u00fck\u00fcm y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe sahip nihai karar\u0131n yeniden g\u00f6zden ge\u00e7irilmesine dair talepler ile ilgili olarak al\u0131nacak yasal tedbir, taleplerin kabul olunamayaca\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmesidir.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Kabul olunamama karar\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu g\u00f6zden ge\u00e7irilmesi talep edilen karar\u0131 veren temyiz kurulu taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu yasal tedbir sadece temyiz kurulunun g\u00fcncel karar\u0131ndan sonraki bir tarihte \u00e7\u0131kan bir karar\u0131 ile ilgili talepler i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erlidir.<\/p><\/div>\n

E\u011fer EPO\u2019nun Hukuki Biriminin temyiz kurulunun bir karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 bir talebin Avrupa Patent Sicili\u2019ne i\u015flenip i\u015flenmemesine karar vermesi istenirse ve e\u011fer talep temel bir prosed\u00fcrel prensibin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ve temyiz kurulunun nihai karar\u0131na dair ise, Hukuki Birim karar\u0131n sicile i\u015flenmesini buyurmaktan ka\u00e7\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r (Bu karar EPC 2000 Madde 112a uyar\u0131nca art\u0131k ge\u00e7erli de\u011fildir).<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 3\/97, G 4\/97: PARAVAN K\u0130\u015e\u0130 TARAFINDAN \u0130T\u0130RAZ” tab_id=”1609057887804-f1d3cb51-8de2″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Bir itiraz, sadece EPC Kural 76(a) nezdinde itiraz sahibi olarak belirlenen bir ki\u015finin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bir taraf ad\u0131na hareket ediyor olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul olunmaz olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclemez.
\nAncak, e\u011fer itiraz sahibinin konumu s\u00fcreci suistimal ederek yasan\u0131n \u00e7evresinden dola\u015fmak \u015feklinde g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcyorsa b\u00f6yle bir itiraz kabul edilmez.<\/div>\n
Yukar\u0131da belirtilen \u015fekilde yasan\u0131n \u00e7evresinden dola\u015fmak \u00f6zellikle \u015fu \u015fartlarda ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar:
\n– itiraz sahibi patent sahibi yerine hareket ediyordur.
\n– itiraz sahibi, m\u00fcvekkil ad\u0131na EPC Madde 134 uyar\u0131nca gerekli vas\u0131flara sahip olmaks\u0131z\u0131n genel olarak patent vekillerinin faaliyetleri ile ili\u015fkili bir zeminde hareket ediyordur.<\/div>\n
Ancak s\u00fcrecin suistimal edilerek kanunlar\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilmesi sadece bu nedenler ile ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmaz:
\n– profesyonel bir vekil kendisi ad\u0131na bir m\u00fcvekkil yerine hareket ediyordur.
\n– EPC \u00fcye \u00fclkelerin birinde ikametgah\u0131 ve asli i\u015fyeri bulunan bir itiraz sahibi, bu \u015fartlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamayan bir \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc taraf yerine hareket ediyordur.<\/div>\n
S\u00fcrecin suistimal edilerek kanunlar\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilip ge\u00e7ilmedi\u011fini belirlemek i\u00e7in, h\u00fcr kan\u0131t de\u011ferlendirmesi prensibi uygulanmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130spat k\u00fclfeti, itiraz\u0131n kabul olamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia eden ki\u015fi \u00fczerindedir. Karar veren kurum, s\u00fcrecin suiistimal edilerek kanunlar\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ildi\u011finden a\u00e7\u0131k ve ikna edici kan\u0131tlar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda emin olmal\u0131d\u0131r.
\n\u0130tiraz sahibinin kimli\u011fi ile alakal\u0131 gerek\u00e7eler ile yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n kabul olunabilirli\u011fine, bu itiraz itiraz birimine yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, temyiz s\u00fcrecinde kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131k\u0131labilir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 1\/98″ tab_id=”1609057908406-c0ae9ae1-f59f”][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Belli bitki t\u00fcrlerinin tek ba\u015flar\u0131na istem konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir istem, bitki t\u00fcrlerini kaps\u0131yor olsa bile, EPC Madde 53(b) nezdindeki patentlenebilirlik \u015fart\u0131ndan muaf tutulamaz.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Bir bitki t\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00fcretim s\u00fcrecine dair bir istem incelenirken, EPC Madde 64(2) dikkate al\u0131nmamal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p><\/div>\n

EPC Madde 53(b)\u2019nin birinci c\u00fcmlesinde bulunan patentlenebilirli\u011fe istisnalar bitki t\u00fcrleri i\u00e7in, hangi y\u00f6ntemle \u00fcretildiklerinden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak ge\u00e7erlidir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla rekombinant gen teknolojisi ile ata bitkiye eklenen genler i\u00e7eren bitki t\u00fcrleri patentlenebilirlikten muaft\u0131r.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 2\/98: AYNI BULU\u015e, R\u00dc\u00c7HAN” tab_id=”1609057925140-a89a17f2-044a”][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

EPC Madde 87(1)\u2019de bahsedilen \u201cayn\u0131 bulu\u015f\u201d i\u00e7in r\u00fc\u00e7han talep etme \u015fart\u0131, EPC Madde 88 uyar\u0131nca bir Avrupa patent ba\u015fvurusunda bulunan bir istem ba\u011flam\u0131nda \u00f6nceki bir ba\u015fvuruya yap\u0131lan r\u00fc\u00e7han\u0131n, ancak konuda uzman ki\u015fi isteme konu hususlar\u0131, yayg\u0131n genel bilgiyi kullanarak \u00f6nceki ba\u015fvurunun tamam\u0131ndan do\u011frudan ve mu\u011flak olmadan \u00e7\u0131karabiliyorsa, tan\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelmektedir.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Gerek\u00e7e 6.6: VE istemleri i\u00e7in birden fazla r\u00fc\u00e7han m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Gerek\u00e7e 6.7: VEYA istemleri i\u00e7in birden fazla r\u00fc\u00e7han m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p><\/div>\n

Gerek\u00e7e 8.2: (i) bir ba\u015fvurunun r\u00fc\u00e7han belirlemede ilk ba\u015fvuru olarak kullan\u0131l\u0131p kullan\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve (ii) sonraki bir Avrupa patent ba\u015fvurusunda bulunan bir istemin EPC Madde 87(1) uyar\u0131nca ayn\u0131 bulu\u015fa dair olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmek i\u00e7in kullan\u0131lacak k\u0131staslar ayn\u0131 olmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 3\/98: EPC MADDE 55″ tab_id=”1609057942658-1e47016a-2e07″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
EPC Madde 55(1)\u2019de bahsedilen 6 ay d\u00f6neminin hesaplanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kullan\u0131lacak tarih, Avrupa patent ba\u015fvurusunun dosyalanma tarihidir. R\u00fc\u00e7han tarihi bu s\u00fcreci hesaplarken kullan\u0131lmayacakt\u0131r.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 4\/98″ tab_id=”1609057965636-8a1d7ce8-dc20″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

EPC Madde 67(4) h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ayr\u0131 olmak \u00fczere, bir Avrupa patent ba\u015fvurusunda EPC \u00fcye \u00fclkelerinden birine y\u00f6nlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ilgili y\u00f6nlendirme harc\u0131 gereken s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde \u00f6denmemi\u015f olsa bile geriye d\u00f6n\u00fck olarak hukuki etkisini yitirmez ve asla ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmemi\u015f olarak kabul edilmez.<\/p><\/div>\n

EPC Madde 91(4)\u2019te tan\u0131mlanan, bir \u00fclke y\u00f6nlendirmesinin geri \u00e7ekilmesi durumu, EPC 1973 Kural 85a\u2019da verilen \u00f6demesiz d\u00f6nem a\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda de\u011fil, EPC 1973 Madde 79(2), Kural 15(2), 25(2) ve 107(1)\u2019de belirtilen s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 a\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girer.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 1\/99: ALEYHE BOZMA YASA\u011eI (REFORMATIO \u0130N PEIUS)” tab_id=”1609057982284-5ca95bb4-02a2″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

\u0130tiraz sahibinin temyiz eden tek taraf olarak temyiz etmeseydi i\u00e7inde olaca\u011f\u0131 durumdan daha k\u00f6t\u00fc bir durumda olmas\u0131na neden olacak \u015fekilde de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015f bir istem prensipte reddedilmelidir.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Ancak, temyiz s\u00fcrecinde itiraz sahibi\/temyiz eden taraf\u00e7a ya da Kurul taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen bir itiraz\u0131n gere\u011fini yerine getirmek i\u00e7in, \u0130tiraz Birimi\u2019nin ara karar\u0131 ile izin verdi\u011fi ve normalde kabul edilemeyecek bir de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fin sonucu olarak de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015f haliyle muhafaza edilmi\u015f patentin aksi takdirde h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fcz k\u0131l\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 durumlar bu prensibe bir istisna te\u015fkil edebilir.<\/p><\/div>\n

B\u00f6yle durumlarda, kusurun \u00fcstesinden gelmek i\u00e7in, patent sahibi\/kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz taraf\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fekilde talep dosyalamas\u0131na izin verilmektedir:
\n– \u0130lk olarak, ba\u015fvuru tarihi itibariyle a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015f bulunan ve muhafaza edilen patentin koruma kapsam\u0131n\u0131 daraltan bir ya da daha fazla unsurun eklenmesinden olu\u015fan bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik;
\n– E\u011fer b\u00f6yle bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011filse, ba\u015fvuru tarihi itibariyle a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015f bulunan ve muhafaza edilen patentin koruma kapsam\u0131n\u0131, EPC Madde 123(3)\u2019\u00fc ihlal etmeden geni\u015fleten bir ya da daha fazla unsurun eklenmesinden olu\u015fan bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik;
\n– Son olarak e\u011fer b\u00f6yle d\u00fczelmeler m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011filse, kabul edilemeyecek de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fin EPC Madde 123(3)\u2019\u00fc ihlal etmeyecek bi\u00e7imde silinmesi.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 2\/99, (G 3\/98): TEHL\u0130KEYE D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcRMEYEN A\u00c7IKLAMA, 6 AY D\u00d6NEM\u0130” tab_id=”1609058002001-36b625a3-802f”][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
EPC madde 55(1)\u2019de bahsedilen 6 ay d\u00f6neminin hesaplanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kullan\u0131lacak tarih, Avrupa patent ba\u015fvurusunun dosyalanma tarihidir. R\u00fc\u00e7han tarihi bu s\u00fcreci hesaplarken kullan\u0131lmayacakt\u0131r.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 3\/99: \u0130T\u0130RAZ\/TEMY\u0130Z\u0130N ORTAK DOSYALANMASI” tab_id=”1609058017447-a100a4a1-da9c”][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

\u0130ki veya daha fazla ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan dosyalanan ve EPC 1973 Madde 99, Kural 1 ve 55\u2019in gereklerini yerine getiren bir itiraz i\u00e7in sadece bir itiraz harc\u0131 yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na izin verilmektedir.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

E\u011fer itiraz sahibi taraf birden fazla ki\u015fiden olu\u015fuyorsa, temyiz EPC 1973 Kural 100 gere\u011fince ortak temsilci taraf\u0131ndan dosyalanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Temyizin, yetkili olmayan bir ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan dosyaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumda, Temyiz Kurulu bu temyizi usulen imzalanmam\u0131\u015f kabul edecektir ve belirlenen s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131nda ortak temsilcinin imzalamas\u0131n\u0131 talep edecektir. Bu talep, temyizi dosyalayan ve yetkili olmayan ki\u015fiye bildirilecektir. E\u011fer \u00f6nceki ortak temsilci art\u0131k temyizin taraf\u0131 de\u011filse, EPC 1973 Kural 100 uyar\u0131nca yeni ortak temsilci belirlenecektir.<\/p><\/div>\n

Patent sahibinin haklar\u0131n\u0131 korumak ve prosed\u00fcrel a\u00e7\u0131dan verim sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in, kimlerin ortak itiraz sahipleri grubuna veya ortak temyiz sahipleri grubuna ait oldu\u011fu prosed\u00fcr boyunca a\u00e7\u0131k olmal\u0131d\u0131r. E\u011fer bir ortak itiraz sahibi veya ortak temyiz sahibi taraf (ortak temsilci dahil olmak \u00fczere) temyizden \u00e7ekilmek istiyorsa, bunun ger\u00e7ekle\u015febilmesi i\u00e7in ortak temsilci ya da EPC Kural 100 uyar\u0131nca belirlenen yeni ortak temsilci EPO\u2019yu bilgilendirmelidir.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 1\/02″ tab_id=”1609058036981-108a5b72-0ece”][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

\u0130kinci Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fck Ba\u015fkan Yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131\u2019n\u0131n 28 Nisan 1999 tarihli bildirisinin (OJ EPO 1999, 506) 4. ve 6. maddeleri, daha \u00fcst seviyedeki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerle \u00e7eli\u015fkiye d\u00fc\u015fmez.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 2\/02, G 3\/02: D\u00dcNYA T\u0130CARET \u00d6RG\u00dcT\u00dc (DT\u00d6) R\u00dc\u00c7HANI” tab_id=”1609058053225-788479fe-6e5d”][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
TRIPS Anla\u015fmas\u0131, Avrupa patentine ba\u015fvuran bir ki\u015fiye ilk olarak dosyalama tarihinde DT\u00d6\/TRIPS Anla\u015fmas\u0131\u2019na \u00fcye olan ancak Paris Anla\u015fmas\u0131\u2019na \u00fcye olmayan bir \u00fclkede dosyalanan bir belgeyi r\u00fc\u00e7han belgesi olarak kullanma hakk\u0131 vermez (EPC 2000 ile ge\u00e7ersiz k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r ancak 13 Aral\u0131k 2007\u2019den \u00f6nce dosyalanan ba\u015fvurular i\u00e7in hala ge\u00e7erlidir).<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”G 1\/03, (G 2\/03): BA\u015eVURU TAR\u0130H\u0130NDE A\u00c7IKLANMAMI\u015e FERAGATLAR” tab_id=”1609058070167-da4637d1-7ef5″][vc_column_text text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Bir istemin, feragat eklenerek de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi, EPC Madde 123(2) uyar\u0131nca yaln\u0131zca ne feragatin ya da feragat ile istemin kapsam\u0131n\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda b\u0131rak\u0131lan hususlar\u0131n ba\u015fvuru belgelerinde dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle reddedilemez.
\nDosyalanan ba\u015fvuruda a\u00e7\u0131klanmayan feragatlere izin verilip verilmeyece\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilirken a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da verilen k\u0131staslar uygulanacakt\u0131r:<\/div>\n
1. Feragatlere,
\n– EPC Madde 54(3) ve (4) uyar\u0131nca bir istemi tekni\u011fin bilinen durumuna g\u00f6re daraltarak isteme yeniden yenilik sa\u011flamak;
\n– EPC Madde 54(2) uyar\u0131nca bir istemi bir tesad\u00fcfi \u00e7ak\u0131\u015fmaya g\u00f6re daraltarak, isteme yenilik sa\u011flamak (bir \u00e7ak\u0131\u015fma bulu\u015f ile e\u011fer konuda uzman ki\u015finin istem konusu bulu\u015fu yaparken g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne almayaca\u011f\u0131 kadar alakas\u0131z ve bulu\u015ftan uzak ise tesad\u00fcfidir) ve;
\n– EPC Madde 52 ila 57 uyar\u0131nca teknik olmayan nedenlerle patentlenebilir olmayan hususlardan feragat etmek,
\ni\u00e7in izin verilebilecektir.<\/div>\n
\n

2. Feragat, yenili\u011fi yeniden sa\u011flamak veya teknik olmayan nedenlerle patentlenebilir olmayan hususlardan feragat etmek i\u00e7in gerekenden fazla teknik unsuru \u00e7\u0131karmamal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

3. Bulu\u015f basama\u011f\u0131 veya teknik a\u00e7\u0131klama yeterlili\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilirken alakal\u0131 olan veya alakal\u0131 hale gelen bir feragat, EPC Madde 123(2)\u2019ye ayk\u0131r\u0131 hususlar ekliyor kabul edilir.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

4. Feragat i\u00e7eren bir istem, EPC Madde 84\u2019te belirtilen a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k ve \u00f6zl\u00fck ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Gerek\u00e7e 2.6.5: \u2026 bir feragat yaln\u0131zca istenilen amaca hizmet edebilir. Birbirine engel te\u015fkil eden ba\u015fvurular ile alakal\u0131 bir feragatin amac\u0131 EPC Madde 54(3) anlam\u0131nda \u00f6nceki bir ba\u015fvuruya g\u00f6re yenilik tesis etmekten ibarettir. EPC Madde 54(2) uyar\u0131nca tekni\u011fin bilinen durumu ile alakal\u0131 bir feragatin amac\u0131, bu kararda tan\u0131mlanan tesad\u00fcfi \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015fmelere kar\u015f\u0131 yenilik sa\u011flamakt\u0131r. Son olarak, patent korumas\u0131 alt\u0131na al\u0131nmaya uygun olmayan hususlar\u0131 harici b\u0131rakan bir feragatin yeg\u00e2ne amac\u0131 bu belirli hukuki engeli kald\u0131rmakt\u0131r. E\u011fer bir feragatin yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan ama\u00e7lardan \u00f6teye giden etkileri mevcutsa, bu feragat kabul edilmez.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Gerek\u00e7e 3: [\u2026] EPC Madde 84\u2019te belirtilen a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k ve \u00f6zl\u00fck ko\u015fullar\u0131, feragat i\u00e7eren istemler i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erlidir.<\/p><\/div>\n

Gerek\u00e7e 4: [\u2026] EPC Madde 87(1) uyar\u0131nca r\u00fc\u00e7han hakk\u0131na temel ve EPC Madde 123(2) uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvurulara yap\u0131lacak d\u00fczelmelere temel olacak feragatler ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde yorumlanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][\/vc_tta_accordion][vc_btn title=”G Kararlar II” color=”sky” link=”url:http%3A%2F%2Fwww.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com%2Ftr%2Fg-kararlar-ii%2F”][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_tta_accordion shape=”square” color=”sky” spacing=”25″ gap=”25″ c_position=”right” active_section=”1″ no_fill=”true” collapsible_all=”true”][vc_tta_section title=”G 1\/83, G 5\/83, G 6\/83: \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 TIBB\u0130 KULLANIM, \u0130SV\u0130\u00c7RE-T\u0130P\u0130 \u0130STEM”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[113],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4633","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-g-kararlar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4633","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4633"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4633\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4947,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4633\/revisions\/4947"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4633"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4633"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4633"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}