{"id":4608,"date":"2019-09-17T20:26:23","date_gmt":"2019-09-17T17:26:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/?p=4608"},"modified":"2021-01-12T21:02:32","modified_gmt":"2021-01-12T18:02:32","slug":"t298-17","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/t298-17\/","title":{"rendered":"17.09.2019 \/T 298\/17 \/PEROXIDE EMULSIONS \/NOURYON CHEMICALS"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u0130tiraz Birimi\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/worldwide.espacenet.com\/publicationDetails\/originalDocument?FT=D&amp;date=20140312&amp;DB=EPODOC&amp;locale=en_EP&amp;CC=EP&amp;NR=2462114B1&amp;KC=B1&amp;ND=4\">EP 2 462 114<\/a>\u00a0patentini iptal etmi\u015ftir. Karar a\u00e7\u0131klama yetersizli\u011finin de itiraz gerek\u00e7esi olarak dahil oldu\u011fu iki itiraz dilek\u00e7esinden hareketle al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130tiraz Birimi karar\u0131n\u0131 tarifnamenin su i\u00e7i ya\u011f em\u00fclsiyonlar\u0131n\u0131n nas\u0131l haz\u0131rlanaca\u011f\u0131na dair konu hakk\u0131nda uzman kimseyi yeterince bilgilendirmemesi hususuna dayand\u0131rmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Patent sahibi temyiz gerek\u00e7esi ile birlikte itiraz prosed\u00fcr\u00fc s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki ana talebi yan\u0131 s\u0131ra d\u00f6rt adet terditli talep dosyalam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ana talebe ait ana istem \u015fu \u015fekildedir:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;Emulsion comprising an oil phase dispersed in an aqueous phase, wherein said oil phase comprises at least 53 wt% and not more than 77 wt% of one or more organic peroxides, more than 50 wt% of which have a molecular active oxygen content of at least 7.00 wt%, said emulsion satisfying the classification tests for organic peroxide type F, and wherein diisobutyryl peroxide makes up at least 95 wt% of the total amount of organic peroxide that is present in the emulsion.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Temyizin muhatab\u0131 itiraz sahibine g\u00f6re tarifnamede \u00d6rnek 1 ve 2\u2019yi okuyan meslek erbab\u0131 istemlerdeki kompozisyonlara ula\u015fmak i\u00e7inde deneme yan\u0131lmaya ba\u015fvurmak zorundad\u0131r. Bir ba\u015fka deyi\u015fle net olarak bilgilendirilmemi\u015ftir. Yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihada g\u00f6re meslek erbab\u0131n\u0131n bulu\u015fun korudu\u011fu unsurlar\u0131 uygulamaya ge\u00e7irmek i\u00e7in ek bilgilenme ihtiyac\u0131 \u015feklinde gereksiz y\u00fck alt\u0131na girmemesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>Temyiz Kurulu\u2019nun g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne g\u00f6re mevcut dosyada sorulmas\u0131 gereken soru, konu hakk\u0131nda uzman kimsenin genel ortak bilgiyi de kullanarak ve tarifnamedeki bilgiler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u0130stem 1\u2019deki em\u00fclsiyonlar\u0131 elde edip edemeyece\u011fidir. Temyiz sahibi son dilek\u00e7esinde konu hakk\u0131nda uzman kimsenin, F tipi organik peroksit klasifikasyon testlerini kar\u015f\u0131layacak em\u00fclsiyonlar\u0131, peroksidin bozunmas\u0131 ile olu\u015fan \u0131s\u0131n\u0131n suyu buharla\u015ft\u0131rmak i\u00e7in gereken \u0131s\u0131dan y\u00fcksek olmas\u0131ndan hareketle tahmin edebilece\u011fini belirtmektedir. Ne var ki Temyiz Kurulu bu y\u00f6nde bir \u00f6nermenin do\u011fru olmas\u0131 halinde bile bunun ba\u015fvuru tarihi itibariyle ortak genel bilgi dahilinde g\u00f6r\u00fclebilmesi i\u00e7in bir kan\u0131t sunulmamas\u0131ndan \u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fc bu arg\u00fcman\u0131 dikkate almam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle \u0130tiraz Birimi\u2019nin patentin iptali karar\u0131 onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u0130tiraz Birimi\u00a0EP 2 462 114\u00a0patentini iptal etmi\u015ftir. Karar a\u00e7\u0131klama yetersizli\u011finin de itiraz gerek\u00e7esi olarak dahil oldu\u011fu iki itiraz dilek\u00e7esinden hareketle<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[112],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4608","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-t-kararlar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4608","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4608"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4608\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5072,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4608\/revisions\/5072"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4608"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4608"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4608"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}