{"id":4588,"date":"2019-10-08T20:16:24","date_gmt":"2019-10-08T17:16:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/?p=4588"},"modified":"2021-01-12T20:51:22","modified_gmt":"2021-01-12T17:51:22","slug":"t1362-15","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/t1362-15\/","title":{"rendered":"08.10.2019 \/T 1362\/15 \/CATALYTIC CONVERTER AND ASSOCIATED METHOD OF ASSEMBLY \/TENNECO"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/worldwide.espacenet.com\/publicationDetails\/originalDocument?FT=D&amp;date=20120509&amp;DB=&amp;locale=en_EP&amp;CC=EP&amp;NR=1787017B1&amp;KC=B1&amp;ND=4\">EP 1787017<\/a>\u00a0yay\u0131n numaral\u0131 Avrupa patentine tescili sonras\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz s\u00fcrecinde patent \u0130tiraz Birimi&#8217;nin karar\u0131yla de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015f formda muhafaza edilmi\u015ftir. Patent sahibi\u00a0\u0130tiraz Birimi&#8217;nin\u00a0karar\u0131n\u0131 temyize g\u00f6t\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f ve dilek\u00e7esinde iki adet sorunun Geni\u015fletilmi\u015f Temyiz Kurulu&#8217;na y\u00f6nlendirilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir. Bu iki soru a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yer almaktad\u0131r:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;1) Does it comply with Art. 123(2) EPC if the features of a plurality of dependent claims are incorporated into an independent claim in a situation in which the application as originally filed includes a claims set with a &#8220;U.S. style&#8221; dependency (with the relevant dependent claims referring back to the independent claim separately), and includes an embodiment in which the features of the independent claim and the dependent claims are shown in combination?<\/p>\n<p>2) If the answer to question 1) is &#8220;yes&#8221;, may the fact that the embodiment possibly shows additional features, result in a violation of Art. 123(2) because of an intermediate generalization despite the fact that the features added to the independent claim are disclosed separately in the U.S. style claims set?&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Temyiz sahibinin \u00f6nerdi\u011fi sorulardan ilki birden fazla farkl\u0131 uygulama bi\u00e7iminin ABD tarz\u0131 yaz\u0131lan farkl\u0131 istemlerde yer almas\u0131 halinde bunlar\u0131n tek bir istem halinde kombine edilmesinin orijinal tarifnameye g\u00f6re kapsam a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 ihlaline (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.epo.org\/law-practice\/legal-texts\/html\/epc\/2016\/e\/ar123.html\">EPC Md. 123(2<\/a>)) yol a\u00e7\u0131p a\u00e7mayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. \u00d6rnek vermek gerekirse alt k\u0131s\u0131mdaki ABD tarz\u0131 yaz\u0131lan istemlerde:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u0130stem 8: A+B+C+X<\/p>\n<p>\u0130stem 12: A+B+C+Y<\/p>\n<p>\u0130stem 15: A+B+C+Z olsun.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>\u00dcst k\u0131s\u0131mdaki senaryodaki istemler Avrupa prosed\u00fcr\u00fcne ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda istem d\u00fczeltmesi olarak a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki istem\u00a0orijinal tarifnameye g\u00f6re kapsam a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 ihlaline (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.epo.org\/law-practice\/legal-texts\/html\/epc\/2016\/e\/ar123.html\">EPC Md. 123(2<\/a>)) yol a\u00e7madan yaz\u0131labilir mi?<\/p>\n<p>Avrupa prosed\u00fcr\u00fcnde d\u00fczeltilen \u00f6rnek istem 10: A+B+C+X+Y+Z<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.epo.org\/law-practice\/case-law-appeals\/recent\/t151362eu1.html\">T 1312\/65<\/a>\u00a0Temyiz Kurulu bu sorular\u0131n Geni\u015fletilmi\u015f Temyiz Kurulu&#8217;na y\u00f6nlendirilmesine gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015f ve sorular\u0131n cevaplar\u0131n\u0131 olumsuz bi\u00e7imde de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>EP 1787017\u00a0yay\u0131n numaral\u0131 Avrupa patentine tescili sonras\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz s\u00fcrecinde patent \u0130tiraz Birimi&#8217;nin karar\u0131yla de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015f formda muhafaza edilmi\u015ftir. Patent sahibi\u00a0\u0130tiraz<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[112],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4588","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-t-kararlar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4588","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4588"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4588\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5062,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4588\/revisions\/5062"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4588"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4588"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4588"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}