{"id":4553,"date":"2019-07-30T19:43:44","date_gmt":"2019-07-30T16:43:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/?p=4553"},"modified":"2021-01-12T21:06:54","modified_gmt":"2021-01-12T18:06:54","slug":"t1798-16","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/t1798-16\/","title":{"rendered":"30.07.2019 \/T 1798\/16 \/DISPOSITIF D&#8217;OUTIL A EXPANSION \/VIRAX"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Patent sahibi \u0130tiraz Birimi\u2019nce al\u0131nan\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/worldwide.espacenet.com\/publicationDetails\/originalDocument?CC=EP&amp;NR=2332716A2&amp;KC=A2&amp;FT=D&amp;ND=3&amp;date=20110615&amp;DB=&amp;locale=en_EP\">EP 2 332 716<\/a>\u00a0patentinin iptali karar\u0131n\u0131 temyize g\u00f6t\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.\u00a0\u0130ptal edilen patentin sahibince temyiz konusu ana talebin ana istemi a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da verilmektedir:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;Dispositif con\u00e7u apte \u00e0 \u00eatre l&#8217;\u00e9l\u00e9ment interm\u00e9diaire entre d&#8217;une part une pince ou machine \u00e0 r\u00e9aliser des embo\u00eetures aux extr\u00e9mit\u00e9s de tuyaux (6) en mati\u00e8re plastique ou composite utilis\u00e9s dans le domaine de la plomberie, et d&#8217;autre part un outil \u00e0 expansion de type classique comportant un embout (2) de forme cylindrique constitu\u00e9 du rapprochement de plusieurs mors (20) en forme de secteurs et mobiles dans le sens radial sous l&#8217;effet de l&#8217;insertion entre eux d&#8217;une aiguille conique (3) pour permettre que lesdits mors (20) passent d&#8217;une position resserr\u00e9e \u00e0 une position \u00e9cart\u00e9e, caract\u00e9ris\u00e9 en ce que ledit dispositif comporte des moyens (4, 42, 5) pr\u00e9vus aptes, lors de la phase o\u00f9 ledit embout (2) passe de la position \u00e9cart\u00e9e \u00e0 la position resserr\u00e9e, \u00e0 entra\u00eener automatiquement ledit embout (2), directement ou indirectement, en pivotement axial selon une portion de tour pour prendre une position angulaire diff\u00e9rente lorsque lesdits mors sont en position initiale resserr\u00e9e, le d\u00e9placement angulaire dudit embout (2) \u00e9tant choisi en fonction du nombre de mors (20), en sorte qu&#8217;apr\u00e8s un pivotement, et m\u00eame plusieurs successifs, lesdits mors (20) ne reprennent pas une position occup\u00e9e pr\u00e9c\u00e9demment par un autre.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Ana istemde ge\u00e7en\u00a0<i>&#8220;le d\u00e9placement angulaire dudit embout (2) \u00e9tant choisi en fonction du nombre de mors (20), en sorte qu&#8217;apr\u00e8s un pivotement, et m\u00eame plusieurs successifs, lesdits mors (20) ne reprennent pas une position occup\u00e9e pr\u00e9c\u00e9demment par un autre&#8221;<\/i>, ifadesinde ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en u\u00e7 par\u00e7as\u0131n\u0131n (2) a\u00e7\u0131sal yer de\u011fi\u015ftirmesi, di\u015flerin (20) say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n bir fonksiyonu olarak se\u00e7ilmektedir ve bunu bir\u00e7ok d\u00f6nd\u00fcrme hareketi izlemektedir.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130tiraz Birimi\u2019nin yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131na g\u00f6re \u201cbirden fazla\/bir\u00e7ok\u201d ifadesi istemdeki koruma kapsam\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rmakta ve istem konusu uygulaman\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini imkans\u0131z hale getirmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>Temyiz sahibinin iddias\u0131na g\u00f6re ise \u201cbir\u00e7ok\u201d ifadesinin s\u00f6zl\u00fck anlamlar\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde \u0130tiraz Birimi taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilen yorum en az muhtemel olan yorumdur; halbuki \u201cen az iki\u201d \u015feklinde bir yorum istemi s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131rabilmektedir. Temyiz sahibi T 190\/99 karar\u0131na at\u0131f yaparak istem okumas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda konu hakk\u0131nda uzman kimsenin mant\u0131\u011fa uygun d\u00fc\u015fmeyen yorumlar\u0131 d\u0131\u015flayarak en uygun teknik anlam\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karacak bi\u00e7imde bir yorum yapmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini hat\u0131rlatmaktad\u0131r. Temyiz sahibi istemdeki ifadenin sadece ihtiya\u00e7 olmas\u0131 halinde ek d\u00f6nd\u00fcrmeleri kapsayacak bi\u00e7imde bir yorumla okunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini iddia etmektedir. Ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde\u00a0<u>&#8220;et m\u00eame plusieurs successifs&#8221;<\/u>\u00a0ifadesinin (ayr\u0131ca bir\u00e7ok d\u00f6nd\u00fcrme ile) iki virg\u00fcl aras\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ve \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde istemde hi\u00e7bir anlam de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine yol a\u00e7mayaca\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmektedir. Yine ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde temyiz sahibi konu hakk\u0131nda uzman kimsenin basit ve temel yeteneklerinin k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesi gerekti\u011fini belirtmekte, konu hakk\u0131nda uzman kimsenin u\u00e7 par\u00e7as\u0131n\u0131n d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f miktar\u0131n\u0131 tespit etmekle ilgili herhangi bir ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131k ya\u015famayaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>Temyizin muhataplar\u0131 temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin a\u00e7\u0131k olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve \u00f6zellikle bozulmas\u0131 arzulanan karar\u0131n hangi zemin \u00fczerinde tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n net olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle temyiz talebinin \u00f6z\u00fcne bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n usulden reddedilmesi gerekti\u011fini ifade etmi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n<p>Temyizin muhataplar\u0131 temyiz sahibinin konu hakk\u0131nda uzman kimsenin istemde teknik olarak anlam olu\u015fturmayan k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131 yok saymas\u0131 ve teknik anlam olu\u015fturacak bir yoruma y\u00f6nelmesi konusundaki yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 ile ilgili olarak temyiz sahibinin istemin dilini \u00f6zg\u00fcrce belirledi\u011fini ve istemin se\u00e7ilmi\u015f bulunan bu dilinin de konu hakk\u0131nda uzman kimse i\u00e7in teknik olarak anlam sahibi olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmektedirler. Buna g\u00f6re uzman kimsenin patentte verilen uygulama a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda koruma kapsam\u0131n\u0131 ger\u00e7ekleme \u015fans\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Temyiz Kurulu temyiz konusu taleplerin a\u00e7\u0131k olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc kabul etmemi\u015f olup \u0130tiraz Birimi\u2019nce al\u0131nan patentin iptali karar\u0131n\u0131n temyiz edilmesinin temyiz eden taraf\u0131n bu karar\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etti\u011finin a\u00e7\u0131k kan\u0131t\u0131 oldu\u011funu ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Temyiz Kurulu di\u011fer yandan temyiz sahibinin arg\u00fcmanlar\u0131n\u0131 ge\u00e7erli bulmam\u0131\u015f ve \u0130tiraz Birimi\u2019nin EPC\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.epo.org\/law-practice\/legal-texts\/html\/epc\/2016\/e\/ar100.html\">Md. 100(b)<\/a>\u00a0a\u00e7\u0131klama yetersizli\u011fi h\u00fckm\u00fc alt\u0131nda ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 iptal karar\u0131n\u0131 onam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Patent sahibi \u0130tiraz Birimi\u2019nce al\u0131nan\u00a0EP 2 332 716\u00a0patentinin iptali karar\u0131n\u0131 temyize g\u00f6t\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.\u00a0\u0130ptal edilen patentin sahibince temyiz konusu ana talebin ana<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[112],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4553","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-t-kararlar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4553","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4553"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4553\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5080,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4553\/revisions\/5080"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4553"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4553"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4553"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}