{"id":4533,"date":"2020-01-28T19:30:53","date_gmt":"2020-01-28T16:30:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/?p=4533"},"modified":"2021-01-12T08:38:31","modified_gmt":"2021-01-12T05:38:31","slug":"t44-16","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/t44-16\/","title":{"rendered":"28.01.2020 \/T 44\/16 \/DISPOSABLE DIAPERS \/PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY"},"content":{"rendered":"

EP 2 399 558<\/a>\u00a0patenti itiraz s\u0131ras\u0131nda iptal edilmi\u015f ve iptal karar\u0131 patent sahibi taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Temyiz Kurulu duru\u015fma davetiyle birlikte iletti\u011fi \u00f6n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da verilen tescil edilmi\u015f ana istemin bulu\u015f basama\u011f\u0131 eksikli\u011fi nedeniyle EPC ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir:<\/p>\n

“A disposable diaper including a colored topsheet, wherein said topsheet has a basis weight of from 12 gsm to 18 gsm and comprises a plurality of bonded points, wherein each of said points has a surface area of from 2 mm**(2) to 5 mm**(2) and wherein the cumulated surface area of the plurality of bonded points is from 10% to 25% of the total surface area of the topsheet.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Patent sahibine g\u00f6re \u00f6nceki teknik kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131ndaki fark unsura dayal\u0131 olarak \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclen teknik problem, bir bebek bezinde renkli \u00fcst tabakan\u0131n t\u00fcketici i\u00e7in sadece estetik de\u011fil, bunun \u00f6tesinde tabakan\u0131n yumu\u015fakl\u0131k alg\u0131s\u0131na ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla artan \u00e7ekicili\u011fine katk\u0131 sa\u011flamakt\u0131r.
\nTaraflar temyiz s\u00fcrecinde alttaki unsurlar\u0131n ana istemin en yak\u0131n bilinen tekni\u011fi temsil eden D1 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda fark \u00f6zellikleri olu\u015fturduklar\u0131 konusunda itirazda bulunmam\u0131\u015flard\u0131r:<\/p>\n

– the topsheet being colored; and<\/p>\n

– the topsheet having a basis weight of from 12 gsm to 18 gsm.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Burada sunulan \u00fcst tabakan\u0131n renklendirilmesi \u00f6zelli\u011fi, teknik bir etkiye sahip olmayan tamamen estetik bir \u00f6zellik olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu, ayn\u0131 zamanda patent tarifnamesinde “olduk\u00e7a g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f bir desenin \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00e7ekicili\u011fini artt\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131” \u015feklinde ifade edildi\u011fi kendi anlat\u0131m\u0131na dayanmaktad\u0131r. Patent sahibinin renkli tabakan\u0131n esteti\u011fin \u00f6tesinde tabakan\u0131n yumu\u015fakl\u0131k alg\u0131s\u0131na ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla artan \u00e7ekicili\u011fine katk\u0131 sa\u011flamas\u0131 konusundaki arg\u00fcman\u0131 inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

\u0130lk olarak, patent sahibinin iddia etti\u011fi ek teknik etkiler, estetik bir \u00f6zelli\u011fin uygulanmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda elde edilen bonus bir etkiden, yani as\u0131l amaca ula\u015f\u0131rken dolayl\u0131 olarak ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan bir etkiden ba\u015fka bir \u015fey de\u011fildir. Ayr\u0131ca, \u00fcst tabakadaki desenin kendisi ile uyumlu olarak olu\u015fturulan ba\u011flant\u0131 noktalar\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n dokunu\u015fu ile fark edilebilir olmas\u0131 da teknik bir fayda \u00fcretmemektedir Desenin bulundu\u011fu tabakan\u0131n alt tabaka ile ba\u011flant\u0131 noktalar\u0131n\u0131n desenle \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015fmesi ve bunu kullan\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n fark ederek takdir etmesinin hangi teknik fayday\u0131 sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k de\u011fildir. Ayr\u0131ca kullan\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n yumu\u015fakl\u0131k alg\u0131s\u0131 da teknik bir de\u011ferlendirmeye ait de\u011fildir. Desenin renkli olmas\u0131 veya renginin kendisi yumu\u015fakl\u0131k alg\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 de\u011fi\u015ftirmemektedir.<\/p>\n

Patentin iptal karar\u0131 teknik etki noksanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kaynakl\u0131 bulu\u015f basama\u011f\u0131 eksikli\u011fi nedeniyle onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

EP 2 399 558\u00a0patenti itiraz s\u0131ras\u0131nda iptal edilmi\u015f ve iptal karar\u0131 patent sahibi taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir. Temyiz Kurulu duru\u015fma davetiyle<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[112],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4533","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-t-kararlar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4533","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4533"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4533\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5015,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4533\/revisions\/5015"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4533"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4533"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4533"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}