{"id":4502,"date":"2020-02-25T17:58:48","date_gmt":"2020-02-25T14:58:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/?p=4502"},"modified":"2021-01-11T23:47:19","modified_gmt":"2021-01-11T20:47:19","slug":"t1902-13","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/t1902-13\/","title":{"rendered":"25.02.2020 \/T 1902\/13 \/COMPUTER BASED METHOD \/SWISS REINSURANCE"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/worldwide.espacenet.com\/publicationDetails\/biblio?DB=EPODOC&amp;II=0&amp;ND=3&amp;adjacent=true&amp;locale=en_EP&amp;FT=D&amp;date=20060426&amp;CC=EP&amp;NR=1649420A1&amp;KC=A1\">EP 1 649 420<\/a>\u00a0ba\u015fvurusu \u0130nceleme Birimi taraf\u0131ndan EPC\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.epo.org\/law-practice\/legal-texts\/html\/epc\/2016\/e\/ar56.html\">Md. 56<\/a>\u00a0alt\u0131nda bulu\u015f basama\u011f\u0131 noksanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle reddedilmi\u015ftir.<br \/>\nTemyiz s\u0131ras\u0131nda incelenecek ana talebe konu ana istem a\u015fa\u011f\u0131dad\u0131r:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;1. A computer-based method for assessing competence of an organization comprising multiple organizational units by computer means (1), the method comprising:<\/p>\n<p>capturing, receiving and storing answer-data by the computer (1) to subsets of predefined questions stored in a memory (12) which are assigned and activated as subsets of the predefined questions based on organizational aspects of a selected organizational unit automatically by the computer (1) based on an organizational unit profile stored in the memory (12);<\/p>\n<p>rating automatically by the computer by means of a rules based expert system the stored content data providing scores to the predefined questions:<\/p>\n<p>storing the scores, in the memory device (12) of the computer (1) corresponding to the answer data from each of the organizational units in response to the set of defined questions, the organizational units corresponding to different groups of individuals, and each of the different groups performing a different function within the organization:<\/p>\n<p>assigning, in the computer (1), each of said scores to the respective one of the organizational units, wherein the scores assigned to the captured answer data are weighted with weighting factors before being stored in the memory (12), the weighting factors being determined by the computer (1) based on the organizational unit and the predefined questions assigned to the respective score from a table containing weighting factors assigned to organizational units and to the predefined questions;<\/p>\n<p>calculating, in the computer (1), total scores for the organizational units, each of the total scores being calculated by adding up the scores assigned to the respective organizational unit;<\/p>\n<p>calculating, in the computer (1), weighted total scores (71\/81) for the organizational units, each of the weighted total scores (71\/81) being calculated individually for the various organizational aspects by adding up weighted maximum scores assigned to the activated questions and to the organizational unit for each organizational unit, the weighted maximum scores each depending on the respective organizational unit and the respective question;<\/p>\n<p>calculating, in the computer (1), competence levels of the organizational units that are scaled to a scale of competence (72\/82) defined by a numerical range of zero to a maximum competence value (73\/83\/84) by multiplying the maximum competence value by a ratio of the total score calculated for the respective organizational unit to the weighted total score (71\/81) calculated for the respective organizational unit;<\/p>\n<p>generating a graphical representation (7\/8) of the competence levels calculated for the organizational units in one common graph by means of a polygon-shaped spider diagram, each of the vertices being assigned to one of the organizational units; and<\/p>\n<p>displayed the graphical representation (7\/8) by means of display (3) so that the competence levels are visualized and so that deficiencies of the competence levels from the maximum competence are visualized, and so that differences between the competence levels of the organizational units are visualized.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Mevcut bulu\u015f, i\u015f dan\u0131\u015fmanlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan geleneksel bi\u00e7imde de\u011ferlendirilmesi yap\u0131lan birden \u00e7ok organizasyonel birim i\u00e7eren bir \u015firketin ba\u015far\u0131 yeterlilik seviyelerini de\u011ferlendirmek i\u00e7in bilgisayar tabanl\u0131 bir y\u00f6nteme y\u00f6neliktir. Bir bilgisayar, \u00f6nceden tan\u0131mlanan sorulara yan\u0131t olarak kurulu\u015f sorumlusu kimselerden al\u0131nan cevaplarla ilgili puanlar\u0131 uygun bi\u00e7imde muhafaza eder. Bilgisayar her bir puan\u0131 kurulu\u015fun ilgili birimleri ile ili\u015fkili olarak tan\u0131mlar. Ayr\u0131ca, bilgisayar, sorulara atanan a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kl\u0131 maksimum puanlar\u0131 toplayarak kurulu\u015f birimleri i\u00e7in a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kl\u0131 toplam puanlar\u0131 hesaplar. A\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kl\u0131 maksimum puanlar\u0131n her biri ilgili kurulu\u015f birimine ve ilgili soruya ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Nihai olarak, bilgisayar organizasyon birimlerinin yeterlilik seviyelerini hesaplar. Sonu\u00e7lar grafiksel bir g\u00f6sterim \u015feklinde sunulur.<\/p>\n<p>Temyiz Kurulu\u2019nun karar\u0131na g\u00f6re ana istem teknik ve teknik olmayan unsurlar\u0131n bir kar\u0131\u015f\u0131m\u0131 \u015feklindedir. \u0130stem EPC\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.epo.org\/law-practice\/legal-texts\/html\/epc\/2016\/e\/ar52.html\">Md 52(2)<\/a>\u00a0kapsam\u0131nda patentlenebilir bulu\u015f niteli\u011finden yoksun kabul edilemez zira\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.epo.org\/law-practice\/case-law-appeals\/recent\/t030258ep1.html\">T 258\/03<\/a>\u00a0Hitachi karar\u0131na uygun olarak teknik bir ara\u00e7 olarak bir bilgisayar atf\u0131na sahiptir.<\/p>\n<p>Ancak bulu\u015f basama\u011f\u0131 incelemesi uyar\u0131nca ve\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.epo.org\/law-practice\/case-law-appeals\/recent\/t000641ep1.html\">T 641\/00<\/a>\u00a0Comvik karar\u0131ndan hareketle \u00f6nceki tekni\u011fe katk\u0131 sunmayan istem unsurlar\u0131 bulu\u015f basama\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmesinde kullan\u0131lamaz.<br \/>\nBulu\u015f basama\u011f\u0131 incelemesi i\u00e7in en yak\u0131n \u00f6nceki teknik if\u015faat\u0131 olarak, \u00f6nceki tekni\u011fe ait oldu\u011fu son derece yayg\u0131n bi\u00e7imde bilinen ve\u00a0<u>her t\u00fcrl\u00fc veriyi saklama, i\u015fleme, atama, \u00f6l\u00e7me ve hesaplama yetilerine sahip genel ama\u00e7l\u0131 bir bilgisayar<\/u>\u00a0al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yetkinlik seviyelerini belirlemek i\u00e7in sorular tasarlamak ve buna ili\u015fkin y\u00f6ntem ad\u0131mlar\u0131 ile a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kland\u0131rma, \u00f6l\u00e7eklendirme ve normlara ait matematiksel \/istatistiksel i\u015flemler, bir ekonomistin veya i\u015f insan\u0131n\u0131n teknik olmayan d\u00fcnyas\u0131na ait g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. (Madde\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.epo.org\/law-practice\/legal-texts\/html\/epc\/2016\/e\/ar52.html\">52(2)(a) ve (c)<\/a>\u00a0EPC). Bir kurulu\u015fun yetkinli\u011fini de\u011ferlendirmek isteyen bir i\u015f dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131 bir dizi kural veya soru tasarlayabilir. Temyiz reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>EP 1 649 420\u00a0ba\u015fvurusu \u0130nceleme Birimi taraf\u0131ndan EPC\u00a0Md. 56\u00a0alt\u0131nda bulu\u015f basama\u011f\u0131 noksanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle reddedilmi\u015ftir. Temyiz s\u0131ras\u0131nda incelenecek ana talebe konu<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[112],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4502","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-t-kararlar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4502","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4502"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4502\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4998,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4502\/revisions\/4998"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4502"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4502"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4502"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}