{"id":4444,"date":"2020-01-24T17:02:36","date_gmt":"2020-01-24T14:02:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/?p=4444"},"modified":"2020-12-26T17:30:42","modified_gmt":"2020-12-26T14:30:42","slug":"t2591-16","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/t2591-16\/","title":{"rendered":"24.01.2020 \/T 2591\/16 \/FIBERS WITH PROPYLENE COPOLYMERS \/EXXONMOBIL"},"content":{"rendered":"

EP 1 268 891<\/a>\u00a0numaral\u0131 patente yap\u0131lan itiraz \u0130tiraz Birimi taraf\u0131ndan reddedilmi\u015ftir. Patent sahibi temyiz dilek\u00e7esine cevaben a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki istem setine sahip terditli talebi dosyalam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/p>\n

“1. A fiber [deleted: comprising] consisting essentially of a reactor produced propylene impact copolymer composition [deleted: comprising:] of<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

a) from [deleted: about] 60% to [deleted: about] 90% by weight Component A based on the total weight of the impact copolymer, wherein Component A [deleted: comprising] is a propylene homopolymer; and<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

b) from [deleted: about] 10% to [deleted: about] 40% by weight Component B based on the total weight of the impact copolymer, wherein Component B [deleted: comprising] is a propylene\/comonomer copolymer wherein the copolymer comprises from [deleted: about] 20% to [deleted: about] 70% by weight propylene and from [deleted: about] 30% to [deleted: about] 80% by weight comonomer and wherein the comonomer is selected from the group consisting of ethylene, butene, hexene and octene.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\u00dcstteki istem setine ili\u015fkin yenilik ve bulu\u015f basama\u011f\u0131 itirazlar\u0131 temyiz sahibi taraf\u0131ndan ilk kez duru\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda dile getirilmi\u015f ve bu durum temyizin kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131 patent sahibi taraf\u0131ndan itiraz konusu yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Temyiz Kurulu ana talebe yap\u0131lan yenilik ve bulu\u015f basama\u011f\u0131 itirazlar\u0131 ile b\u00fcy\u00fck oranda benzerlik ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan yeni itirazlar\u0131 incelemeye kabul etmi\u015ftir; zira patent sahibinin ana talep i\u00e7in yap\u0131lan itirazlar\u0131n terditli talepler i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunu de\u011ferlendirmi\u015f olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 varsaym\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Temyiz Kurulu \u0130stem 1\u2019deki \u201ccomprising\u201d ifadesinin \u201cconsisting of\u201d ile de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesinin\u00a0Md. 123(2)<\/a>\u00a0kapsam a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 ihlaline yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki itiraz\u0131 hakl\u0131 bulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Temyiz sahibi ana istemdeki \u201creactor produced” ifadesinin usul yoluyla \u00fcr\u00fcn istemi (product-by-process claim) \u00f6zelinde usul sayesinde \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc kendisinde karakterize edici \u00f6zellikler olu\u015fmas\u0131 ko\u015fulunu sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yani bu usul sayesinde \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn kendi nitelikleri de\u011fi\u015fmedi\u011finden bir usul \u00fczerinden do\u011frudan \u00fcretilebilir (directly obtainable) olma \u015feklinde ifade edilen usul yoluyla \u00fcr\u00fcn istemi ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmektedir.\u00a0 Kurul \u201creactor produced” ifadesinin usul yoluyla \u00fcr\u00fcn istemi \u015feklinde de\u011ferlendirilmemesi gerekti\u011fi konusunda karar belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Bulu\u015f basama\u011f\u0131 incelemesi en yak\u0131n \u00f6nceki teknik olarak D1\u2019e k\u0131yasla yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. D1 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda fark unsurca ele al\u0131nan teknik problem, artt\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir uzama de\u011ferine sahip dokunmam\u0131\u015f kuma\u015flar\u0131n \u00fcretimi i\u00e7in uygun liflerin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 \u015feklinde tan\u0131mlanabilir. \u00d6nerilen \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm ise esasen bir “reakt\u00f6r taraf\u0131ndan \u00fcretilen” ICP’den (darbeli kopolimer) olu\u015fan bir elyaf olup, “reakt\u00f6r taraf\u0131ndan \u00fcretilen” ICP’nin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k\u00e7a % 60 ila % 90’\u0131 “Bile\u015fen A” olarak tan\u0131mlanan bir propilen homopolimeri ve geri kalan % 10 ila % 40 “reakt\u00f6r taraf\u0131ndan \u00fcretilen” a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k\u00e7a ICP, “Bile\u015fen B” olarak da tan\u0131mlanan bir propilen\/komonomer kopolimeridir. Ayr\u0131ca \u0130stem 1, propilenin Bile\u015fen B’nin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k\u00e7a % 30 ila 80’ini olu\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131 ve komonomerin etilen, buten, heksen ve okten aras\u0131ndan se\u00e7ilmesini tan\u0131mlamaktad\u0131r. D1\u2019e k\u0131yasla \u0130stem 1 elyaf\u0131 sadece bir “reakt\u00f6r taraf\u0131ndan \u00fcretilen” ICP’den yap\u0131l\u0131rken, D1’in \u00d6rnek 7’sindeki elyaf, bir ICP’nin (“heterofazik polimer A”) propilen homopolimeri ile kar\u0131\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Temyiz sahibinin fark unsurun teknik etkisinin olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131yla veya m\u00fcspet olarak kan\u0131tlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ilgili itirazlar\u0131 temyiz konusu patentteki test sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 ile dayanak buldu\u011fundan bulu\u015f basama\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131 geri \u00e7evrilmi\u015f ve temyiz reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

EP 1 268 891\u00a0numaral\u0131 patente yap\u0131lan itiraz \u0130tiraz Birimi taraf\u0131ndan reddedilmi\u015ftir. Patent sahibi temyiz dilek\u00e7esine cevaben a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki istem setine sahip<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[112],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4444","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-t-kararlar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4444","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4444"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4444\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4446,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4444\/revisions\/4446"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4444"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4444"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4444"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}