{"id":4418,"date":"2020-01-20T16:35:20","date_gmt":"2020-01-20T13:35:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/?p=4418"},"modified":"2020-12-26T17:30:42","modified_gmt":"2020-12-26T14:30:42","slug":"t1426-14","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/t1426-14\/","title":{"rendered":"21.01.2020 \/T 1426\/14 \/GENERATING COLLABORATIVE CONTENT \/CODIGITAL"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/worldwide.espacenet.com\/publicationDetails\/biblio?II=0&amp;ND=3&amp;adjacent=true&amp;locale=en_EP&amp;FT=D&amp;date=20120418&amp;CC=EP&amp;NR=2441035A1&amp;KC=A1\">EP 2 441 035<\/a>\u00a0numaral\u0131 patent \u0130nceleme Birimi taraf\u0131ndan reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Dosya temyiz incelemesindeyken 9. y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccret \u00f6demesi s\u00fcresi gelmi\u015f ve \u00f6deme s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. EPC\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.epo.org\/law-practice\/legal-texts\/html\/epc\/2016\/e\/r51.html\">Kural 51(2)<\/a>\u00a0alt\u0131nda tan\u0131ml\u0131 alt\u0131 ayl\u0131k cezal\u0131 \u00f6deme s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde de yap\u0131lmayan y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccret \u00f6demesi \u00fczerine\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.epo.org\/law-practice\/legal-texts\/html\/epc\/2016\/e\/r112.html\">Kural 112(1)<\/a>\u00a0alt\u0131nda ba\u015fvurunun geri \u00e7ekilmi\u015f kabul edilmesi dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ge\u00e7ersizlik yaz\u0131s\u0131 iletilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvuru sahibi bunun \u00fczerine\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.epo.org\/law-practice\/legal-texts\/html\/epc\/2016\/e\/ar122.html\">Md. 122<\/a>\u00a0alt\u0131nda haklar\u0131n\u0131 yeniden tesis etme ba\u015fvurusu yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu s\u0131rada t\u00fcm \u00f6zen ve dikkate ra\u011fmen\u00a0<em>(all due care<\/em>) ba\u015fvurunun ge\u00e7ersiz hale gelmesinin \u00f6nlenememesine gerek\u00e7e olarak a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki a\u00e7\u0131klamalar sunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>\u00d6ncelikle patent ba\u015fvurusunun y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretleri vekil taraf\u0131ndan de\u011fil harici bir y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccret \u00f6deme firmas\u0131 (CPA) taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6denmektedir. Ayr\u0131ca CPA ve m\u00fcvekkil, vekil firma \u00fczerinden de\u011fil do\u011frudan ileti\u015fim kurmaktad\u0131r. 8. y\u0131l \u00f6demesi ise CPA \u00fczerinden de\u011fil vekil arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve m\u00fcvekkile gider olarak yans\u0131t\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r zira CPA mevcut ba\u015fvuruyu ge\u00e7mi\u015f y\u0131llardaki \u00f6deme g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fckleri nedeniyle takip listesinden \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015f ve m\u00fcvekkile 8. y\u0131l hat\u0131rlatmas\u0131 g\u00f6ndermemi\u015ftir. Vekil ofis ise EPO\u2019nun Kural 51(2) yaz\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 al\u0131nca dosyay\u0131 kontrol ederek y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccret \u00f6deme takip sorumlulu\u011funun CPA firmas\u0131nda oldu\u011funu g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f ancak CPA kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131 kontrol ederek dosyan\u0131n asl\u0131nda y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccret hat\u0131rlatma listesinde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 fark etmemi\u015ftir. Di\u011fer yandan vekil yine de m\u00fcvekkile ula\u015farak y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretin cezal\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde \u00f6denebilece\u011fini hat\u0131rlatm\u0131\u015f ve m\u00fcvekkil de ba\u015fvurunun ge\u00e7erli kalmas\u0131n\u0131 arzu etti\u011fini bildirmi\u015ftir. Ne var ki bu ileti\u015fimin ard\u0131ndan m\u00fcvekkil bir yanl\u0131\u015f anlama sonucu CPA ile ileti\u015fime ge\u00e7memi\u015f ve y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccret \u00f6demesi Md. 51(2) s\u00fcresinde yap\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 zamanda CPA firmas\u0131 m\u00fcvevekil ile temasa ge\u00e7erek ayn\u0131 patentin ABD aile \u00fcyesi i\u00e7in y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccret \u00f6demesi hat\u0131rlatmas\u0131nda bulunmu\u015f ve m\u00fcvekkil firman\u0131n Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u2019\u00fc Bay Hood bu i\u015flemin Avrupa ba\u015fvurusuna ili\u015fkin oldu\u011funu sanarak \u00f6deme talimat\u0131 vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>EPC\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.epo.org\/law-practice\/legal-texts\/html\/epc\/2016\/e\/r136.html\">Kural 136(4)<\/a>\u00a0alt\u0131nda haklar\u0131n yeniden tesisine zaman\u0131nda yap\u0131lmayan i\u015flemle ilgili karar\u0131 almaya etkili organ karar vermektedir. Mevcut \u00f6rnekte \u015eekli \u0130nceleme Birimi ilgili karar\u0131 almaya yetkilidir. Di\u011fer yandan \u0130nceleme Birimi ad\u0131na Kural 112(1) hak kayb\u0131 bildirimini \u00e7\u0131karan \u015eekli \u0130nceleme Birimi bu bildirimi temyiz incelemesi devam ederken \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.epo.org\/law-practice\/case-law-appeals\/recent\/t910473ex1.html\">T 473\/91<\/a>\u00a0karar\u0131 ile uyumlu halde temyiz incelemesi devam ederken haklar\u0131n yeniden tesisi meselesine karar verme yetkisi Temyiz Kurulu\u2019ndad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Temyiz Kurulu yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 incelemede \u201call due care\u201d, yani tam \u00f6zen ve dikkat kriteri gereklerinin kar\u015f\u0131lan\u0131p kar\u015f\u0131lanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 incelemi\u015ftir.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.epo.org\/law-practice\/case-law-appeals\/recent\/j080003eu1.html\">J 3\/93<\/a>\u00a0karar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tam \u00f6zen ve dikkat sorumlulu\u011fu bir vekilin atanm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu durumlar dahil olmak \u00fczere\u00a0<u>ba\u015fvuru sahibindedir<\/u>.<\/p>\n<p>Mevcut vaka \u00f6zelinde vekil taraf\u0131nda iki hata vuku bulmu\u015ftur:<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(i)\u00a0 CPA firmas\u0131na 8. y\u0131l \u00fccret \u00f6demesi sonras\u0131nda takip sorumlulu\u011funun yeniden vekile ge\u00e7ti\u011fi bildirilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(ii)\u00a0 \u00a0\u0130kinci hata olarak Kural 51(2) yaz\u0131\u015fmas\u0131na cevaben sorumlulu\u011fun CPA\u2019de oldu\u011fu varsay\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ancak CPA veritaban\u0131 kontrol edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Vekil daha sonra cezal\u0131 s\u00fcreyi m\u00fcvekkile hat\u0131rlatm\u0131\u015f ancak bu kez m\u00fcvekkil taraf\u0131nda \u015fu hatalar vuku bulmu\u015ftur:<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(i) Bay Hood temyiz sahibi firman\u0131n sahibi ve y\u00f6neticisidir. Bu bak\u0131mdan Temyiz Kurulu b\u00fcy\u00fck i\u015fletmelerden beklenen tam \u00f6zen ve dikkat kriteri e\u015fi\u011finin \u015fah\u0131s firmalar\u0131 i\u00e7in daha d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini kabul etmektedir. Ba\u015fvuru sahibi bir profesyonel vekil ve bir y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccret \u00f6deme takip firmas\u0131 ile \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen patent ba\u015fvurusunun y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretini zaman\u0131nda \u00f6deyememi\u015ftir. Bu durum vekil kendisine cezal\u0131 s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde hat\u0131rlatma yapmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n vuku bulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(ii) Di\u011fer yandan Bay Hood CPA Global firmas\u0131n\u0131n iletti\u011fi hat\u0131rlatmada mevzu bahis patentin ABD patenti oldu\u011funu ve vekilinin g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi hat\u0131rlatmadaki patentin ise Avrupa patenti oldu\u011funu fark etmemi\u015ftir. Her iki hat\u0131rlatma da hangi patent dok\u00fcmanlar\u0131n\u0131n mevzu bahis oldu\u011fu konusunda ku\u015fku uyand\u0131rmayacak niteliktedir. Ayr\u0131ca Bay Hood g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi e-posta mesaj\u0131nda <em>&#8220;[t]his email is to confirm that I wish to renew US patent number 8868489. Please advise re payment&#8221;<\/em>\u00a0ifadelerine yer vermi\u015f, yani \u00f6demenin ABD patentine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011funun ay\u0131rd\u0131nda olarak talimat iletmi\u015ftir. Bu hata Bay Hood\u2019un iki patente ait \u00f6demelerin de ayn\u0131 talimat alt\u0131nda iletilebilece\u011fi varsay\u0131m\u0131ndan kaynaklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Yukar\u0131daki hatalar\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvuru sahibinin tam \u00f6zen ve dikkat kriterinin minimum e\u015fi\u011fine uygun ko\u015fullar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve haklar\u0131n yeniden tesisine m\u00fcsaade edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>EP 2 441 035\u00a0numaral\u0131 patent \u0130nceleme Birimi taraf\u0131ndan reddedilmi\u015ftir. Dosya temyiz incelemesindeyken 9. y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccret \u00f6demesi s\u00fcresi gelmi\u015f ve \u00f6deme<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[112],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4418","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-t-kararlar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4418","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4418"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4418\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4419,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4418\/revisions\/4419"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4418"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4418"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alfapatent-stanadvoka.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4418"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}